Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Trimmed examples: Both are persuasive examples. Deletions of factual information are disfavored. Readers can decide whether something is persuasive.
Line 66: Line 66:     
Later on, I will be going through the lengthy list of arguments to trim and refine the page to the best arguments that can be made about this.  [[User:GregG|GregG]] 23:53, 25 April 2012 (EDT)
 
Later on, I will be going through the lengthy list of arguments to trim and refine the page to the best arguments that can be made about this.  [[User:GregG|GregG]] 23:53, 25 April 2012 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Both are persuasive examples.  Deletions of factual information are disfavored.  Readers can decide whether something is persuasive.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:58, 25 April 2012 (EDT)
Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,795

edits

Navigation menu