Changes

3,702 bytes added ,  13:20, May 25, 2012
m
Reverted edits by QuidingtonT (talk) to last revision by FosterL
Line 5: Line 5:  
The fatal flaw in Old Earth arguments is their overreliance on the assumption that the [[Radiometric dating|rate of radioactive decay]] remains constant over thousands of years. In fact, a large number of physical processes, such as neutron capture and fluctuations in solar radiation, can affect the rate of radioactive decay of elements in the Earth's crust and render radioactive dating measurements unreliable with errors up to 5%, depending upon the specific methods used.<ref>http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899536205000138#bib6</ref>  
 
The fatal flaw in Old Earth arguments is their overreliance on the assumption that the [[Radiometric dating|rate of radioactive decay]] remains constant over thousands of years. In fact, a large number of physical processes, such as neutron capture and fluctuations in solar radiation, can affect the rate of radioactive decay of elements in the Earth's crust and render radioactive dating measurements unreliable with errors up to 5%, depending upon the specific methods used.<ref>http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899536205000138#bib6</ref>  
   −
The Earth is 4.5 Billion years old FULL STOP. thers no argument in the matter geologists (SCIENTISTS) have proven completley through evidence and data, no god or anceint book writen like 700 years after it was set (bible) was involved its all evidence,data and science. ATHEISM + SCIENCE FTW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
+
== Historical views ==
 +
[[Image:Landscape.jpg|right|300px]]
 +
For most of recorded history humans of many backgrounds, such as St. Barnabas and St. Irenæus,<ref>Burnet, p. 259.</ref> viewed the age of the Earth to be around 6,000 years.<ref>Burnet, p. 258.</ref>
 +
 
 +
Saint Cyril who came into Great Moravia (present day [[Slovakia]] and Moravia in [[Czech Republic]]) from [[Byzantine Empire]] in 863 as Christian missionary wrote in his poem Proglas<ref>{{cite web
 +
|title=Proglas
 +
|publisher=sme.sk
 +
|url=http://zlatyfond.sme.sk/dielo/93/Filozof_Proglas
 +
|language=Slovak
 +
|access date=05.05.2012
 +
|quote=The parchment version of Proglas in Cyrillic from 13th century was discovered in 1858 by Russian Slavic scholar Hilferding}}</ref> (dedicated to his works on translation of the four biblical Gospels to Slavonic language) following sentence that brings testimony about the perception of the age of the world that time: {{cquote|
 +
  To the holy Gospels I am the Foreword
 +
  for as it was promised by the prophets
 +
  Christ comes to gather the nations
 +
  for he sheds light on the world entire.
 +
  That is what happened ''in our seventh millennium''}}<ref>{{cite web
 +
|title=Proglas, the foreword to the Old Church Slavonic translation of the four Gospels
 +
|publisher=The Centre for Information on Literature, Slovakia
 +
|url=http://www.litcentrum.sk/36106
 +
|access date=05.05.2012
 +
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
 +
|author=Konštantín Filozof
 +
|title=Proglas
 +
|publisher=sme.sk
 +
|location=Slovakia
 +
|url=http://zlatyfond.sme.sk/dielo/93/Filozof_Proglas/1
 +
|language=Slovak
 +
|access date=05.05.2012
 +
|quote=Under ''the seventh millennium'' is meant here the age from the creation of the world. The figure was composed of the time elapsed by the birth of Christ, i.e. 5508 years, on top of which was added 863 years (date for the arrival of Constantine and Methodius to Moravia). The result was 6371 years, thus the seventh millennium.}}</ref> 
 +
 
 +
In 1830, Dr. Hales published a list of 120 historical authorities from various cultures who had decided on an official [[date of creation]].  These ranged from 6984 B.C. to 3616 B.C.<ref>Batten 2002 quotes from "Young’s Analytical Concordance of the Holy Bible", 1879 8th Edition, 1939, which relates this, and reproduces the selection of the dates from Young.</ref>
 +
 
 +
Included in Hales' list is [[James Ussher]], who calculated the famous date of 4004 B.C. for creation.  Young Earth creationists still consider this date to be close to the actual date.
 +
 
 +
In 1778 George-Louis Lecrerc, Count of Buffon, proposed that the Earth was about 74,832 years old.<ref name="ingv">INGV</ref>
 +
[[James Hutton]], while not proposing a date, dismissed the Biblical account and claimed in 1785 that there was not evidence of a beginning at all.<ref name="ingv" />
 +
[[Charles Lyell]] supported Hutton's idea in 1830, in ''Principles of Geology''.<ref name="ingv" />
 +
 
 +
In 1854 [[Hermann von Helmholtz]] estimated an age of between 20 and 40 million years.<ref name="ingv" />
 +
Around the same time [[Lord Kelvin]] put his mind to deriving an age, and came up with a range between 20 million years and 400 million years.  He later refined that down to between 20 million and 40 million years.<ref name="ingv" />  More recent discoveries of radioactivity and mantle convection explain why the assumptions Helmholtz and Kelvin made resulted in dates that are much lower than current uniformitarian estimates.
 +
 
 +
The 1911 edition of the [[Encyclopedia Britannica]] discussed dates up to 500 million years.<ref>Encyclopædia Britannica, pp 650-651.</ref>
 +
 
 +
By about 1930, J. H. Jeans was arguing for an age of the Earth of around two billion years.<ref>Universal History of the World, p.76.</ref>
 +
 
 +
Using circular logic -- assuming that decay rates remained constant despite necessarily changing physical characteristics as time approached the origin -- Old Earth proponents insist that the Earth is 4.5 billion years old based on an assumption of constancy in [[Potassium-argon dating|Potassium-argon (K:Ar) decay rates]] and other radiometric methods.<ref>Peck, 2000, p.376.</ref>
    
FISH IS TECKNICLY FISH
 
FISH IS TECKNICLY FISH
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,464

edits