Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,148
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 34:
Line 34: − +
Debate: U.S. Supreme Court ruling on ObamaCare: a proper ruling? (view source)
Revision as of 01:15, June 29, 2012
, 01:15, June 29, 2012→Brace yourself for the backlash Democrats: It's coming! =
::No capitation, or other direct, tax shall be laid, unless in proportion to the census or enumeration herein before directed to be taken. 1.9.4. Also this isn't even a tax question, the tax code has not been changed at all. There was no raise in taxes and there was no deduction added for people who have healthcare, this is clearly nothing more than a penalty. Back when this was going through congress Obama laughed at the notion that it was a tax hike and said critics only said that to make it look like a commercial regulation was a tax, but now that its constitutionality has been questioned its a tax!?
::No capitation, or other direct, tax shall be laid, unless in proportion to the census or enumeration herein before directed to be taken. 1.9.4. Also this isn't even a tax question, the tax code has not been changed at all. There was no raise in taxes and there was no deduction added for people who have healthcare, this is clearly nothing more than a penalty. Back when this was going through congress Obama laughed at the notion that it was a tax hike and said critics only said that to make it look like a commercial regulation was a tax, but now that its constitutionality has been questioned its a tax!?
== Brace yourself for the backlash Democrats: It's coming! ===
== Brace yourself for the backlash Democrats: It's coming! ==