Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No change in size ,  02:39, July 10, 2012
Line 18: Line 18:  
[[User:SaraT|SaraT]] 13:32, 6 December 2009 (EST)
 
[[User:SaraT|SaraT]] 13:32, 6 December 2009 (EST)
   −
== Thermal Recoil - Not an anomalt ==
+
== Thermal Recoil - Not an anomaly ==
    
The following paper explains that the anomalous measurements can be completely accounted for when thermal recoil pressure is taken into consideration. Then, there is no statistically significant deviation. I think I will make it my mission to solve an anomaly a day relating to the relativity article. It is no way incompatible with religion, and therefore there is no need to attempt to discredit a flawless model of our universe that has passed every test ever thrown at it. For those still a bit confused, this has nothing to do with moral relativism, and I sincerely doubt that Jesus would mind if you acknowledge that mass can distort space-time. I mean, hey, he's the one that made it that way!?  
 
The following paper explains that the anomalous measurements can be completely accounted for when thermal recoil pressure is taken into consideration. Then, there is no statistically significant deviation. I think I will make it my mission to solve an anomaly a day relating to the relativity article. It is no way incompatible with religion, and therefore there is no need to attempt to discredit a flawless model of our universe that has passed every test ever thrown at it. For those still a bit confused, this has nothing to do with moral relativism, and I sincerely doubt that Jesus would mind if you acknowledge that mass can distort space-time. I mean, hey, he's the one that made it that way!?  
43

edits

Navigation menu