89
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 1:
Line 1: − <br> − <center><b align="center" style="width: 70%; background:#FF0000;color:#FFFF00;border: 4px #800000 solid; font-size: 50px;">WARNING: THIS IS NOT TO BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY.</b><br><br><br>'''</center> −
reverted vandalism
'''''Conservapedia''''' content has often been proven right on topics ranging from science to politics to the World Cup,<ref>Although incredibly rare, [[Conservapedia proven wrong|Conservapedia has been occasionally wrong]], but usually about trivial matters and even then it is usually mostly right.</ref> even for predictions that some [[liberals]] have ridiculed. Examples include:
'''''Conservapedia''''' content has often been proven right on topics ranging from science to politics to the World Cup,<ref>Although incredibly rare, [[Conservapedia proven wrong|Conservapedia has been occasionally wrong]], but usually about trivial matters and even then it is usually mostly right.</ref> even for predictions that some [[liberals]] have ridiculed. Examples include: