Changes

a reply to user:conservative
Line 22: Line 22:  
::::There isn't much sign that this is intended as humor, given User:Conservative's other output (much of which is in this style). If it is humor I propose it be moved from the essay space to the humor space, along with other "essays" like this one. [[User:AndrewTompkins|AndrewTompkins]] 13:46, 14 July 2012 (EDT)
 
::::There isn't much sign that this is intended as humor, given User:Conservative's other output (much of which is in this style). If it is humor I propose it be moved from the essay space to the humor space, along with other "essays" like this one. [[User:AndrewTompkins|AndrewTompkins]] 13:46, 14 July 2012 (EDT)
 
I see that proud atheists/agnostics/evolutionists are still gagging on this web page material. The gagging will intensify now that I added [[Atheism and cowardice]] in the caption of the picture! Just have Dawkins address [[Daniel Came]]'s concerns about Dawkins's behavior and I will gladly delete this particular material. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:13, 14 July 2012 (EDT)
 
I see that proud atheists/agnostics/evolutionists are still gagging on this web page material. The gagging will intensify now that I added [[Atheism and cowardice]] in the caption of the picture! Just have Dawkins address [[Daniel Came]]'s concerns about Dawkins's behavior and I will gladly delete this particular material. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:13, 14 July 2012 (EDT)
 +
:::::I am hardly "gagging" on this material, just making some observations. Clearly we have a difference of opinion on the value of this page and all of the other essays of this sort, but I do have a question for you, User:Conservative—why would an atheist/agnostic/evolutionist take this essay seriously, given its content and tone (mostly unrelated pictures with boisterous captions and links to similar articles)? [[User:AndrewTompkins|AndrewTompkins]] 16:24, 14 July 2012 (EDT)