Changes

1,429 bytes added ,  13:59, July 25, 2012
Line 68: Line 68:  
:TK is not blocked out of choice, he has gone to pastures greener.  In any case, the user you know as NathanG had a personal relationship with one of the senior admins, and I understand that relationship has now ended.  You would be well advised not to interfere with NathanG's case. If he wants to come back he can go through the appropriate channels.   
 
:TK is not blocked out of choice, he has gone to pastures greener.  In any case, the user you know as NathanG had a personal relationship with one of the senior admins, and I understand that relationship has now ended.  You would be well advised not to interfere with NathanG's case. If he wants to come back he can go through the appropriate channels.   
 
:Can I suggest that you not go unblocking people from the past, you won't last long yourself.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 09:31, 25 July 2012 (EDT)
 
:Can I suggest that you not go unblocking people from the past, you won't last long yourself.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 09:31, 25 July 2012 (EDT)
 +
::Alright, well, I had no idea what I wandered into with this. I suppose if NathanG wants to be unblocked they can contact someone about it. As for my unblocking people, I still believe most of the unblocks have been warranted.
 +
 +
::If I don't last long, well, I don't last long. I write and edit as passionately as I do because I believe in what I'm doing. If I see people who shouldn't be blocked, I believe in trying to make things right, although as you can see, I have no intention of bypassing other moderators. I'm sure there are cases like this where I don't know what's going on, and thus if anyone dislikes an unblock, I'll discuss it out and try to understand what's going on. I have no intention of reverting any blocks by Andy or Conservative, period. I respect that it's his site and put his decisions foremost.
 +
 +
::But as long as I've been given this block ability, I feel I have a responsibility to do what's right and make sure the right people have been blocked. I can't just turn a blind eye and pretend it hasn't happened. If the wrong people are blocked, it gives conservatives, Creationists, and Christians a bad name. It harms the entire site by preventing good people from helping make it better. Frankly, if I was the kind of person who just overlooked wrong things occurring, and didn't try to make things better, I'd still be at Wikipedia. --[[User:Jzyehoshua|Joshua Zambrano]] 09:59, 25 July 2012 (EDT)
SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
1,134

edits