Changes

1,924 bytes added ,  17:06, April 11, 2007
m
Line 114: Line 114:     
This article gets better and better.  Now it states that the definition is not clear (which is fair enough) yet still has figures for the liberal quotient of journalists and news anchors. I guess that at least makes it clear that these numbers were more or less plucked out of thin air. [[User:Chrysogonus|Chrysogonus]] 16:24, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
 
This article gets better and better.  Now it states that the definition is not clear (which is fair enough) yet still has figures for the liberal quotient of journalists and news anchors. I guess that at least makes it clear that these numbers were more or less plucked out of thin air. [[User:Chrysogonus|Chrysogonus]] 16:24, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
−
   
+
 
 +
::Responding to [[User:Ed Poor]] above, I have a couple of questions.  
 +
 
 +
::First, and simplest, is what does any of this have to do with "teasing Andy"?  I'm really lost on that one. 
 +
 
 +
::Second, do you know how IQ numbers are determined?  You give a large group of developmentally "equal" people (like a given grade in school, or age) a standardized test, that is set up so all of them will get some of it right, but none of them can get it all correct.  Then you take the raw scores and create a transfer function to map them to a Gaussian distribution curve (bell curve).  The peak of the curve is marked as "100", and the score scale is created by picking a numerical increment to be equal to each standard deviation (sigma).  This is typically 15-16 points = one sigma, making it so five sigmas each way yields IQs of 20-25 and 175-180 - very rare figures indeed, since five sigmas corresponds to less than 0.0001% of the population (I forget the exact number, it's actually even smaller). 
 +
 
 +
::I do think that the formula presented (which "explains" the numbers in the last paragraph exactly) is simpler.  Using it, for example, on the number of self identified liberals and conservatives on wikipedia (212 vs 75 today), the LQ = 212/(212+75) = 212/287 = 73.9% or 0.739.  The CQ is 75/287 = 26.1% or 0.261.  The network news example starts off pre-Fox at 3 liberal and no conservatives, LQ = 3/(3+0) = 1 or 100%. You can apply this formula to any group where you have a number for each preference (i.e., registered Republicans and Democrats out of all registered voters).
 +
 
 +
::I really don't care whether or not this article makes "sense", but since it is so easy to have it make sense, why not do it?  The original text just wasn't thought all the way through, as numerous mathematically astute editors have mentioned above, in an attempt to make this a better article. [[User:Human|Human]] 13:06, 11 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 
 
==Black protestants==
 
==Black protestants==
  
2,014

edits