Scientific results

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ed Poor (talk | contribs) at 16:45, August 28, 2012. It may differ significantly from current revision.
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Scientific results in a given area are considered hard facts by the people doing the work. The rest of the world reads the initial reports of the work and treats them as soft evidence, based on the reputation of the author, the author’s institution, and the journal. [1]