User:DonnyC/Openmindedness

Test Your Open-mindedness

Do you resist admitting the possibility that a conservative approach to education is far more effective for students than a liberal one?
If it were proven to your satisfaction that some idea you've been using to bolster a political argument was false, would you keep using that idea in your argument?
Do you resist admitting that something you accepted for over a decade is, in fact, completely false?
Do you resist the possibility that Hollywood values result in significant harm for those who believe in them, and to innocent bystanders?
Do you think it is impossible that increased gun ownership reduces the rate of crime?
When President Ronald Reagan told Mr. Gorbachev to tear down the Berlin Wall, would you have thought that it was politically impossible for the Berlin Wall to be torn down?
Did you think, or still think, that the Strategic Defense Initiative ("Star Wars") is impossible?
Do you think that it is impossible that the Shroud of Turin is authentic?
Do you think that there must be a purely material-based explanation (such as magnetism) for remarkable homing and migration behavior of birds and butterflies?
Do you think that it is impossible for the speed of light to have been different in the past?
Do you think that it is impossible to measure openmindedness?
Do you think that evolution^[1] must have occurred?
Do you think that is impossible for the power of 2 in Newtonian gravity, whereby the gravitational force is proportional to 1/r², to be more precise with an exponent that is slightly different from 2, such as a gravitational force proportional to 1/r^2.00000001?
Do you resist admitting that some things taught to you in school are completely false, and even known to be false by some responsible for the material?
Do you deny that some widely required theories of science, such as the theory of evolution, may actually impede the progress of science?^[2]
Do you deny that the imposition of socialism and same-sex marriage on a nation could harm its competitiveness at international events like the Olympics?
Do you refuse to consider the possibility that "experts" may not have all the answers, and that the best of the public may have valuable insights to which experts are blind?
Do you think that if you read parts of the Bible years ago as a child, you can claim to "have read the Bible" and that you have no reason to read it regularly now?
Do you believe that because the Earth's orbit and rotation are what they are now, they are guaranteed to remain stable for billions of years?
Do you refuse to consider the possibility that Hebrews might have been authored by Jesus?

â By "evolution" is meant the theory of evolution, especially universal common descent.
â

[1] â By "evolution" is meant the theory of evolution, especially universal common descent.

[2] â
Back problems: how Darwinism misled researchers

Backwardly wired retina âan optimal structureâ New eye discovery further demolishes Dawkins

Biomimetics - Expert engineer eschews âevolutionary designâ

Biometrics - Examples of Scientists copying nature

Cutting out a useless vestigial argument

More nails in the coffin of âjunk DNAâ

The lingering death of junk DNA

15 questions that evolutionists cannot satisfactorily answer

Questions for evolutions - Vox Day

[3] Back problems: how Darwinism misled researchers

[4] Backwardly wired retina âan optimal structureâ New eye discovery further demolishes Dawkins

[5] Biomimetics - Expert engineer eschews âevolutionary designâ

[6] Biometrics - Examples of Scientists copying nature

[7] Cutting out a useless vestigial argument

[8] More nails in the coffin of âjunk DNAâ

[9] The lingering death of junk DNA

[10] 15 questions that evolutionists cannot satisfactorily answer

[11] Questions for evolutions - Vox Day

[1]

[2]

User:DonnyC/Openmindedness

Test Your Open-mindedness

Navigation menu

Search