Counterexamples to an Old Earth

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Specialman (talk | contribs) at 23:08, July 20, 2015. It may differ significantly from current revision.
Jump to navigation Jump to search
"Tidal friction causes the moon to recede from the earth at 4 cm per year. It would have been greater in the past when the moon and earth were closer together. The moon and earth would have been in catastrophic proximity (Roche limit) at less than a quarter of their supposed age."[1] see: Recession of the moon from the earth

It takes only one counterexample to disprove the theory of an Old Earth. Most of the "evidence" for an Old Earth is based on claims that lack testability, such as radiometric dating, and hence would not even satisfy minimum requirements for admissibility in a court of law. If each of the following 45 counterexamples to an Old Earth has merely a 10% chance of being valid, then the probability that the Earth is billions of years old is only 1%. In other words, the Earth must be young with a likelihood of 99%.[2] [3]

In addition, much additional scientific evidence points to a young age of the earth and the universe, and the biblical creation organization Creation Ministries International published articles entitled 101 evidences for a young age of the earth and the universe and How old is the earth? both of which summarize some of the evidence for a young age of the earth.

The motivation for atheists to insist on falsely teaching that the Earth is old is to pull students away from God's immediate presence and to turn them away from Jesus Christ. Atheists are also motivated, and biased, by the fact that their evolutionist theories require the world to be an implausible billions of years old.

WELCOME TO JESUSLAND: POPULATION: this hairy wiki of shit WELCOME TO JESUSLAND: POPULATION: this hairy wiki of WELCOME TO JESUWELCOME TO JESUSLAND: POPULATION: this hairy wiki of shit WELCOME TO JESUSLAND: POPULATION: this hairy wiki of WELCOME TO JESUSLAND: POPULATION: this hairy wiki of shit WELCOME TO JESUSLAND: POPULATION: this hairy wiki of shit SLAND: POPULATION: this hairy wiki of shit WELCOME TO JESUSLAND: POPULATION: this hairy wiki of WELCOWELCOME TO JESUSLAND: POPULATION: this hairy wiki of shit WELCOME TO JESUSLAND: POPULATION: this hairy wiki of WELCOME TO JESUSLAND: POPULATION: this hairy wiki of shit WELCOME TO JESUSLAND: POPULATION: this hairy wiki of shit ME TO JESUSLAND: POPULATION: this hairy wiki of shit WELCOME TO JESUSLAND: POPULATION: this hairy wiki of WELCOME TO JESUSLAND: POPULATION: this hairy wiki of shit WELCOME TO JESUSLAND: POPULATION: this hairy wiki of shit

69696

Recommended books

  • William R. Corliss, Anomalies in Geology: Physical, Chemical, Biological (A Catalog of Geological Anomalies), 1989. ISBN 915554-23-2
  • William R. Corliss Neglected Geological Anomalies, 1990. ISBN 915554-24-0
  • William R. CorlissInner Earth: A Search for Anomalies (A Catalog of Geological Anomalies), 1991. ISBN 915554-25-9
  • William R. Corliss, Carolina Bays, Mima Mounds, Submarine Canyons (A Catalog of Geological Anomalies), 1988. ISBN 915554-22-4

External links

Footnotes

  1. ↑ Age of the earth
  2. ↑ The same analysis can be applied to the Young Earth theory, but no valid counterexamples have been found in centuries of atheist attempts. In addition, there are over 100 proofs of a young earth and universe (Please see: Age of the earth: 101 evidences for a young age of the earth and the universe).
  3. ↑ The same analysis can be applied to the Young Earth theory, but no valid counterexamples have been found in centuries of atheist attempts. In addition, there are over 100 proofs of a young earth and universe).

See also

v • d • e
Counterexamples
Counterexamples to:
Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_an_Old_Earth&oldid=1165885"