Talk:John E. Jones III
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by All Fish Welcome (talk | contribs) at 23:00, April 21, 2007. It may differ significantly from current revision.
Conservative your an embarrassment. Etaroced 02:13, 21 April 2007 (EDT)
Signed an order prohibiting appeal???? And your a LAWYER???? Wow. Etaroced 02:16, 21 April 2007 (EDT)
- Yeah, do you have a cite, Andy?-AmesGyo! 10:30, 21 April 2007 (EDT)
- I thought that the newly-elected Dover school board members agreed to a settlement that prohibited an appeal, and Jones signed it. RSchlafly 12:49, 21 April 2007 (EDT)
Plagiarism Goofiness
The DI blogger in question suggested Jones may have committed plagiarism, inviting the reader to "decide for yourself." He didn't make an accusation, and we should not characterize his statements as such. If you find another source where a DI blogger accuses Jones of plagiarism, by all means change the wording again, but also change the note to a source that actually supports such a claim. The whole thing is kind of goofy, and I don't want to make DI's writing staff look worse than they already do.--All Fish Welcome 18:56, 21 April 2007 (EDT)
- Furthermore, one of my sentences was modified to read, "The source was later acknowledged in the published text of the speech," but the original note was left intact. The original note does not support the proposition that the source was later acknowledged in the published text. It only supports the proposition that the source is acknowledged in the published text as of xx April, 2007. If you can find another source that supports the idea that the Lambert citation was not present in the originally published text, by all means, put it in. But do not make footnoted statements in which the note does not support your text.--All Fish Welcome 19:00, 21 April 2007 (EDT)