Textual
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RSchlafly (talk | contribs) at 18:55, April 26, 2007. It may differ significantly from current revision.
Textualism is a legal theory that courts should rely on the plain meaning of the words in the Constitution and in other laws. Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia is a prominent textualist. For a recent example of his view, see Zuni v Dept. of Education[1], where there appeared to be a difference between the intent of a statute and its plain meaning.
| Part of the series on |
| U.S. Discrimination Law |
| Standards of Review |
| Other Legal Theories |
| Defining Moments in Law |
|
The 14th Amendment |
| Modalities of Constitutional Law |