Talk:Alliance Defending Freedom
Objection to recent edit
I strongly oppose this recent edit to the article -- the ADF has done a lot of good work on religious liberty issues and has strongly defended the religious liberty of Christians on numerous different issues. They are even brave enough to defend young Earth creationists (AiG, Andrew Snelling, etc.). They are clearly conservative and pro-religious liberty -- and they have a "badge of honor" from the SPLC to prove they are truly conservative. So despite all this, we're going to completely defame them and treat them almost like a leftist organization simply because they chose not to take a position on the travel ban?
Two things here: considering that the ADF exists to protect religious liberty, I'm not surprised that they didn't take a position on a case that is about immigration and national security. Also, keep in mind that they didn't oppose the Trump Administration in the case -- they simply didn't take a position. Also, there really should be a source that their leadership is part of the "Never Trump" movement. This isn't enough for me to harshly attack them in the article's intro.
I am OK leaving all of the info in the article, but the intro should be rephrased closer to how it was before. Taking no position on a non-religious liberty case is not enough to defame the organization. --1990'sguy (talk) 00:01, 24 June 2018 (EDT)