Talk:Hindenburg

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AmesG (talk | contribs) at 17:15, May 6, 2007. It may differ significantly from current revision.
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Implying on the front page that the deaths of 35 people are not tragic is kind of tacky.-AmesGyo! 12:42, 6 May 2007 (EDT)

Agreed! Tribal Totem 12:43, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
Perhaps they were bad people... They seem to have mostly been foreigners, after all. [1] --Jeremiah4-22 12:50, 6 May 2007 (EDT)

The notion that the airships like the Hindenburg had a future is not correct. Passanger jets would regularly cross the Atlantic within twenty years of the disaster. If anything, the US Navy already knew that airships were not relaible, having lost several in the 1930s, as shown here <ttp://spot.colorado.edu/~dziadeck/airship/usa.htm>

Please correct the article, then. And while you're at it, don't make those 35 lives sound so devalued. I can't stand that.-AmesGyo! 13:15, 6 May 2007 (EDT)