The 1619 Project
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 1990'sguy (talk | contribs) at 05:38, January 6, 2020. It may differ significantly from current revision.
The 1619 Project is a collection of revisionist history developed by The New York Times to "reframe" (in their words)[1] American history exclusively around slavery and racism.
The work has been roundly criticized,[2] including by prominent historians James Oakes,[3] Gordon S. Wood,[4] Victoria Bynum,[5] James McPherson,[6] and Richard Carwardine.[7]
References
- ↑ The 1619 Project
- ↑ Lowry, Rich (January 3, 2020). Historians Roast the 1619 Project. National Review. Retrieved January 5, 2020.
- ↑ An interview with historian James Oakes on the New York Times’ 1619 Project
- ↑ An interview with historian Gordon Wood on the New York Times’ 1619 Project
- ↑ Historian Victoria Bynum on the inaccuracies of the New York Times 1619 Project
- ↑ An interview with historian James McPherson on the New York Times’ 1619 Project
- ↑ Oxford historian Richard Carwardine on the New York Times’ 1619 Project