Conservapedia:Front Page

Wikipedia also has News on the right side, but most of the front page matter is "encylopedic". Here, today, on the right it is about the madman at Virginia Tech and several references to his Anti Christian Rant - on the right and the left side ... and am sure it will dominate the front page. Also, Bible quotations on the front page? Encylopedia or a platform to push the Bible? Is anything else quotable on the front page? User:Seekcommon

I know what you mean, shouldn't we wait until the official investigation reveals new facts, instead of immediately politicizing the whole case and just maybe try to use reason and logic to analyse this case.

Maybe something like this: (I know it's just speculation and I have no tangible evidence for this.)

To me it seems that guy was a troubled kid, probably obsessed with unreachable women, who was laughed by his "rich-kid" classmates and felt cornered by his parent's strong religious beliefs and one day decided he wanted to "make the world pay", like those kids from Columbine. The name Ishmael could be (notice the use of the words "could be" instead of "is") a reference to him recognizing himself in the biblical Ishmael who was rejected by his society, instead of an alledged Muslim connection.

I'd say that's the just about the whole story, no conspiracies against "America" and no evil brainwashing porn.

So yes, propaganda like this and all of the "liberals this and liberals that" crap doesn't belong on the front page of an encyclopedia"

Middle Man

GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN. GOD DOES NOT EXIST, JESUS WAS A CONMAN.

Don't Change A Thing

The front page is everything I expect from a conservative internet publication. You don't like the way it reads, start liberapedia.--jp 23:27, 29 April 2007 (EDT)

Id hate to think what they would have on their front page.Bohdan

I'd be willing to consider this suggestion to create 'liberapedia' a valid one, were it not for the existence of wikipedia. The genuine, unbiased medium that it provides is something that I have often found so-called 'liberals' to approve of strongly. Attempts to immitate it would, I think, be met with skepticism and be percieved as lacking credibility.

I also find it strange that you even make the suggestion, since the "About Conservapedia" section of this website already proclaims Wikipedia to be "6 times more Liberal than the American Public". Simple

2Evil&GodlessLiberals

1. Religious texts aren't propaganda. 2. Go to the bottom of the web page and read "About Conservapedia". 3. Read previous posts and see where that conflicts with "About Conservapedia" statement. 4. Respond in an evil, godless, liberal manner. Happy Earth day!--Roopilots6 14:56, 22 April 2007 (EDT)

I guess I am puzzled for referring to a response with quotes from Matthew as Evil and Godless. I guess Matthew is someone else then and in his writing and in the Bible I saw, it is something very different. I appreciate your pointing them out to me. From now on, I will consider everything Matthew has written to be evil. Unless, you can correct me since you know everything. User:Seekcommon

Look what they came up with now: according to the front page Mr. Schlaffy can apparently predict the future: he already knows who's going to win the second round of the French Presidential elections.

Seekcommon, I'm right there with you.

Middle Man

Since you know everything? Last time I heard that was from a 10 year old girl; and she was right. Dude, he only won the first round, get a grip! Also, thanks for following number four. Please, carry on.--Roopilots6 08:51, 23 April 2007 (EDT)

I do agree with you on the issue of age, we do lose a lot as we age, I know, I have an intelligent one myself that I learn from. But I am curious, point 4, you talk about responding in an "Evil, Godless, Liberal" manner ... Does that also refer to my quoting Matthew? User:Seekcommon

Of course I know he only won the first round, but the front page says he won the elections altogether.

Middle Man

Then again, a story from the Left. When Daniel Ortega was defeated the first time in Nicaragua, Peter Jennings that this incredible look on his face and kept wondering how he lost when "polls" indicated that he should have won. It is as if, Jennings so wanted Ortega to win that he could not accept the decision. Mainstream media were stunned that a left winger lost an election. So, stuff happens. User:Seekcommon