Talk:Settled science

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ed Poor (talk | contribs) at 01:00, July 8, 2007. It may differ significantly from current revision.
Jump to navigation Jump to search

€d why wa$te a good opportunity to i££u$trate the $en$e of free trade? The
¢urrent arti¢£e cou£d be u$ed to ju$sify £ibera£ Fa£$ehood$ that ¢onfu$e ab$o£ute advantage with ¢omparative advantage i.e. off$horing and the importation of unde$ired produ¢t$. Even £ibera£ prote¢tioni$t
e¢onomi¢$ are pedd£ed here. i$ thi$ ¢ommypedia? BritishConservative 20:35, 7 July 2007 (EDT)

I believe this is meant to illustrate the silliness of "settled science".--Autofire 20:38, 7 July 2007 (EDT)

You know, if you'd quit using currency symbols in place of letters, it would make your statement much easier to understand.--Autofire 20:44, 7 July 2007 (EDT)
I assume that if liberals reply with jokes, etc., it means they acknowledge that they cannot dispute the facts or principles involved. Why else would they try to make a distraction? --Ed Poor Talk 21:00, 7 July 2007 (EDT)