Talk:Gravity
This is the current revision of Talk:Gravity as edited by Elamdri (talk | contribs) at 07:16, March 12, 2007. This URL is a permanent link to this version of this page.
"The considerable disagreement between scientists about the theory of gravity suggests that, like evolution, the theory will eventually be replaced with a model which acknowledges God as the source of all things, the Prime Mover, and the only real fundamental force in the universe."
Where should I start? It's all commentary (no sources), and there is no reference to the widely accepted big bang theory, which suggests that all things in the universe are moving further away.. --Hojimachong 01:53, 7 March 2007 (EST)
- Thanks for pointing this out. I think vandals are responsible for the above, which I removed. Then I read further and removed more. Please improve.--Aschlafly 02:02, 7 March 2007 (EST)
- Do we need an article for the topics that don't disagree with wikipedia? We're basically just duplicating wikipedia's entry with far less research and editing time.--Jesusina 22:50, 7 March 2007 (EST)
- Gravity itself is not a theory. It is an observed phenomenon. Rather, what actually causes gravity is the theory.--Elamdri 03:16, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
- Do we need an article for the topics that don't disagree with wikipedia? We're basically just duplicating wikipedia's entry with far less research and editing time.--Jesusina 22:50, 7 March 2007 (EST)