User talk:CWilson

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Linus M. (talk | contribs) at 19:12, March 13, 2007. It may differ significantly from current revision.

Incest

The incest article is up for deletion. Surely a fellow quoter of the Bible is as mad as I am!--Meekrok 14:19, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

Divorce

Please stop. The encyclopedia is supposed to have an NPOV, and not to condem people to hell. It's not a blog. In addition, you must understand that, for Christians, the influence Mosaic law has been removed to some extent. I don't have a quote at hand, but it's there. Geekman314(contact me) 14:39, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

Conservapedia is not a place to present Biblical data as undeniable fact, as much as I might agree with much of it. That's what personal websites are for. Geekman314(contact me) 14:44, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
You may put in as much Biblical data as you wish, but please retain an NPOV, and don't present it as the only valid perspective, even if you believe it is. Geekman314(contact me) 14:59, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
Your newest version was somewhat better. Thank you. Geekman314(contact me) 15:04, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
Actually, the point is not to have a liberal bias, not to have a conservative bias. The two are different concepts. It's an understandable mistake, though, especially for the casual peruser of the encyclopedia :). Geekman314(contact me) 15:12, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

Earth

Your uncle is not a dependable primary source, but I'm sure he's a fine individual. If you want to back up your viewpoints, they're different enough that they deserve a real citation.--AmesG 14:38, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

Also, neutrality does not mean stating inane, insupportable opinions.--AmesG 14:42, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

Magellan sailed around the world. What has supposedly changed since then?? --Dave3172 14:44, 13 March 2007 (EDT)