User talk:CWilson

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bobtexas (Talk | contribs) at 20:33, March 15, 2007. It may differ significantly from current revision.

Jump to: navigation, search

Incest

The incest article is up for deletion. Surely a fellow quoter of the Bible is as mad as I am!--Meekrok 14:19, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

Divorce

Please stop. The encyclopedia is supposed to have an NPOV, and not to condem people to hell. It's not a blog. In addition, you must understand that, for Christians, the influence Mosaic law has been removed to some extent. I don't have a quote at hand, but it's there. Geekman314(contact me) 14:39, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

Conservapedia is not a place to present Biblical data as undeniable fact, as much as I might agree with much of it. That's what personal websites are for. Geekman314(contact me) 14:44, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
You may put in as much Biblical data as you wish, but please retain an NPOV, and don't present it as the only valid perspective, even if you believe it is. Geekman314(contact me) 14:59, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
Your newest version was somewhat better. Thank you. Geekman314(contact me) 15:04, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
Actually, the point is not to have a liberal bias, not to have a conservative bias. The two are different concepts. It's an understandable mistake, though, especially for the casual peruser of the encyclopedia :). Geekman314(contact me) 15:12, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
Thanks for correcting my grammatical error. I don't know what my deal is today… Geekman314(contact me) 17:23, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

Earth

Your uncle is not a dependable primary source, but I'm sure he's a fine individual. If you want to back up your viewpoints, they're different enough that they deserve a real citation.--AmesG 14:38, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

Also, neutrality does not mean stating inane, insupportable opinions.--AmesG 14:42, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

Magellan sailed around the world. What has supposedly changed since then?? --Dave3172 14:44, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

Good article!

I'm still in shock that the group exists, but good article on the Flat Earth Society.--AmesG 15:35, 13 March 2007 (EDT)




I'm not the one putting wiki things up. --John 20:56, 13 March 2007 (EDT) Ah, I see what happened. I rolled back the "mulatto" thing but didn't realize it also put wikipedia things up. --John 20:58, 13 March 2007 (EDT) "Mulatto" is considered offensive. In America, at least, most people would say he's African American. A sociologist could define this in a much more complicated way, but calling him African American wouldn't offend most people. --John 21:04, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

Excellent articles, CWilson! Keep up the good work!TylerD.

No problem, glad you approve. ColinR 19:36, 14 March 2007 (EDT)

President Articles

Sounds good! I've always been interested in presidents, so this should be a fun projetc. Bobtexas 16:33 PM, 15 March 2007 (EDT)

Retrieved from "https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:CWilson&oldid=39360"