Talk:Origin of Life
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Philip J. Rayment (talk | contribs) at 01:43, March 26, 2008. It may differ significantly from current revision.
Grammatical error
There are numerous instances in this article where "creationist" (singular) should be "creationists" (plural).
Bootstrap problem
Why no mention thereof?
Scientific American
- Scientific American isn't really a journal. Masterbratac 15:03, 19 August 2007 (EDT)
Essay
This does not meet our standards for an article, but is an essay. --şŷŝôρ-₮KṢρёаќǃ 20:46, 21 August 2007 (EDT)
References
Would anyone mind if I reformat the links in the references section? And not to involve myself in any controversy, but while the article is well-sourced, the anti-naturalistic origin quotes do seem a little densely packed at the moment... Feebasfactor 18:23, 17 September 2007 (EDT)
And while we're at it, the Mystery of Life Video Clips is an internal, not an external one
And while we're at it, the Mystery of Life Video Clips is an internal, not an external one, and therefore belongs in the See Also section. TheGySom 20:00, 25 March 2008 (EDT)
- Fixed, but could you try and keep your headings shorter? Thanks. Philip J. Rayment 21:20, 25 March 2008 (EDT)
- Thanks, I was trying to use a similar style to attract the attention of Conservative TheGySom 21:23, 25 March 2008 (EDT)
- Heh. There are some people whose examples you should follow, and some you should not! :-) Philip J. Rayment 21:43, 25 March 2008 (EDT)
- Thanks, I was trying to use a similar style to attract the attention of Conservative TheGySom 21:23, 25 March 2008 (EDT)