FDA v. Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corp.

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by NathanG (talk | contribs) at 02:08, April 30, 2008. It may differ significantly from current revision.
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120 (2000), a 5-4 U.S. Supreme Court rejected an attempt by the Clinton Administration to regulate tobacco products.

The Court held that the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (Act)[1], when viewed as a whole, implicitly excluded tobacco products from the FDA's jurisdiction. The Court reasoned that if the FDA had power to regulate tobacco products, then the Act would require the it to remove tobacco entirely from the market. This would be contrary to the congressional intent as illustrated by tobacco-specific legislation.

References

  1. 21 U.S.C.S. § 301 et seq.