Talk:Sexual ethics

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by EngelUmpocker (talk | contribs) at 20:55, May 2, 2008. It may differ significantly from current revision.
Jump to navigation Jump to search

That's it?

You would think that a topic as complex as this would merit a bit more then a quote from Bill Bennett

DLerner

I dunno, he is quite studly. Barikada 23:18, 31 January 2008 (EST)
Yeah, but doesn't this perpetuate the slander that conservatives are afraid of sex? :) DLerner
Well, I dunno. You could argue that it's not family friendly... Because sex doesn't create families. Barikada 23:22, 31 January 2008 (EST)
Ouch, you have quite a bite :). DLerner
Th... thanks? :P Barikada 23:32, 31 January 2008 (EST)

Why is this page locked? And why is the only comment Bible-related? Either erase it and lock it or put something more on it. [The kids find out about it sometime, whether your encyclopedia wants them to or not...] FlightlessOstrich 16:50, 15 March 2008 (EDT)

Surely even homeschoolers should know how babies are made. God created our bodies and created sex - what are these dumboes afraid of? Alberti 10:32, 30 March 2008 (EDT)

Article needs expansion

While I understand that the project is desirous of a family-friendly encyclopedia, this article is patently ridiculous. And locked. Pplease add something benign, perhaps along the lines of:

Sexual intercourse is the mechanism by which human beings mate and reproduce offspring. The Penis enters the Vagina, the male's Sperm fertilises the female's egg, and the child forms in the womb.

There can hardly be the slightest objection to something as simple as that, a matter-of-fact description for children of how we all came to be. EngelUmpocker 16:55, 2 May 2008 (EDT)