Talk:BBC News
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hojimachong (talk | contribs) at 01:42, March 19, 2007. It may differ significantly from current revision.
Should the BBC be allowed as a referring source if it allows this sort of contentand this.âThe preceding unsigned comment was added by republican (talk)
- ...And what do those articles have to do with it being used as a reliable source? That's news; it's reporting on studies. And it's made up of tens of thousands of people, so the whole corporation can't be blamed for one reporters articles. --Hojimachongtalk 21:29, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
I am wondering about here Conservative and myself seem to be in a quandrywhat do you think? As a reference if this was reverted by another sysopts should the BBC no longer be taken as a source? ">republican
- Well, the notion that the oldest, largest, and most well-respected news corporation on earth shouldn't be used as a source is completely ridiculous in any respect. If you can't use BBC, then of course CNN, FOX, Al-Jazeera (no pun intended), MSNBC, ABC News, CSM, etc. wouldn't be authoritative at all. A news Corp. reports news; that is, they report on the finding of other people. --Hojimachongtalk 21:42, 18 March 2007 (EDT)