Vestigial structures
Vestigial structures are structures/organs that are said to not have a function based on the theory of evolution.[1] The list of vestigial organs in humans has gone from 180 in 1890 to none in 1999[1], and some have important functions. Jerry Bergman wrote:[1]
| â | Few examples of vestigial organs in humans are now offered, and the ones that are have been shown by more recent research to be completely functional (and in many cases critically so, see Bergman and Howe)...
One popular book on the human body which discussed vestigial organs stated that next to circumcision
|
â |
Evolutionist claim that snakes have vestigial features.[2] According to the science magazine New Scientist:
| â | Scientists have found fossils of a legged snake with âhipsâ â a specimen that could be the most primitive snake ever unearthed. The find suggests early snakes were not creatures of the sea and has reignited the debate over how snakes evolved.
Sebastián ApesteguÃa at the Argentine Museum of Natural History and his team found the snake fossil in a terrestrial deposit in the RÃo Negro province of north Patagonia, Argentina, in 2003. Unlike a handful of legged fossils found in marine deposits and identified as snakes over the past decade, the new fossil, named Najash rionegrina, has a well-defined sacrum supporting a pelvis and functional hind legs outside of its ribcage.[3] |
â |
Creation scientists dispute that snakes with legs are evidence for the theory of evolution:
| â | Even assuming it could be established that the ancestor of snakes today had legs, creationists have no problem in principle with loss of features through natural processes. Development of leglessness is not evidence for molecules-to-man evolution, which requires addition of new genetic information. Loss of legs could be achieved through degeneration of the DNA information sequences that specify leg development.[4] | â |
Different views
In the view of secular evolutionists, vestigial structures are some of the best evidence in favor of evolution and against Intelligent Design because the most parsimonious explanation for these structures' existence is that they were once functional in progenitor species, but were rendered useless by evolution. According to Occam's Razor, all other things being equal, the solution that makes the fewest assumptions is the best.
However, this argument ignores the counter argument of the fall, where it is understood that current conditions are not the way God originally designed, and that vestigial structures are, if anything, evidence for devolution, not evolution.[5]
Furthermore, the fact that science has not determined the function of a particular structure does not mean that the structure has no function. Indeed, as stated earlier evolutionists have in the past proposed 180 human organs as being vestigial, but we now know that the vast majority of those organs have since been found to have definite functions,[1] including the tonsils, thymus, and the pineal gland. The tonsils were found to help fight infection, and the thymus and pineal gland were both found to secrete important hormones.[6]. In addition, a number of suggestions have been made about the role of the human appendix.[7]
Sources
- Anon., Snakes with legs? A preliminary reply, 20th March 2000.
- Anon., Scientists may have found appendixâs purpose, MSNBC, 5th October, 2007.
- Batten, Don, and Sarfati, John, âVestigialâ Organs: What do they prove? (Creation Ministries International).
- Bergman, Jerry, "Do any vestigial organs exist in humans?", Journal of Creation 14(2):95â98, August 2000. HTML, PDF.
- Darwinism Refuted.com, The Myth of Vestigial Organs.
- Glover, Warwick, The human vermiform appendix Journal of Creation 3(1):31â38, April 1988.
- Ham, Ken, and Wieland, Carl, Your appendix ... itâs there for a reason, Creation 20(1):41â42, December 1997.
- New Scientist Oldest snake fossil shows a bit of leg, 19th April, 2006
- Wilkinson, Richard, Cutting out a useless vestigial argument, Creation 26(3):51, June 2004.
- Zimmer, Carl, How the snake lost its legs: Snakes, researchers once thought, descended from humble burrowing lizards. New evidence suggests a marine pedigree, and a family tree that includes 45-foot reptiles, Discover, July 1997.