User talk:Kilmarnock

From Conservapedia
This is the current revision of User talk:Kilmarnock as edited by Kilmarnock (talk | contribs) at 01:55, July 1, 2008. This URL is a permanent link to this version of this page.
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This edit and removal the you pointed out was not censorship [1], at least not in the way you are thinking of. There are similar edits to this on various other pages, but the last line to this particular posting is something I and many others will not tolerate, which is the insultive rant of an individual who intends to pick a fight. That particular user and his edit was removed from the site. Karajou 01:28, 12 May 2008 (EDT)

'Get a grip' is not an ad hominem attack and further accusations of this kind will be dealt with appropriately. Bugler 16:36, 18 June 2008 (EDT) P.S. MYOB
I have responded on your talk page. Your presupposition is incorrect. Kilmarnock 17:07, 18 June 2008 (EDT)

On the other hand, personal remarks like the following are out of line:

  • how insecure you are
  • you cannot argue against my points like a civilised being

Not even Wikipedia tolerates that kind of abuse. Apologize before asking to come back. --Ed Poor Talk 18:16, 19 June 2008 (EDT)

I have replied on your talk page. And I am shocked at the kind of abuse I have received. In turn, I would expect an apology from you. Kilmarnock 18:30, 27 June 2008 (EDT)
I'm sorry you haven't received the welcome you expected. But perhaps if you will make sure not reply in kind when "abused" other contributors will rally around you. Can you do that? --Ed Poor Talk 19:08, 27 June 2008 (EDT)
You explained my second blocking from you as harassment? I suggest you take your own advice. Kilmarnock 21:55, 30 June 2008 (EDT)