Talk:Keith Olbermann

What factual mistakes were in the removed paragraph?--Nomine Cervus 00:15, 3 April 2007 (EDT)

If one is going to make a factual assertion ("Democrat", "activist"), provide cites.--WJThomas 13:51, 4 April 2007 (EDT)

Wow, that's a wacky argument. "Olbermann never adressed the fact that Jack Bauer has demonstrated that the proper use of force against terrorists produce the results we need in the war on terror." Maybe that's because Jack Bauer is a fictional character in a story?

And to think some people this that it's the Dungeons and Dragons players who can't tell reality from fantasy.... ---Ghoti 19:06, 26 May 2007 (EDT)

This is less about Olbermann than it is a response to his shenanigans. Let's condense the anti-Olbermann rant and leave a link to the website that's dedicated to slamming him.

06/27

Sorry, I couldn't come up with a better subject heading. I removed the tag of him as a Democrat. No one can argue that he isn't liberal, but I can find no proof of him being a registered Democrat, the two are not automatic. Also, this page needs cleanup badly. As it stand right now, it reads like an angry high schooler doing a forced report. I will be happy to take on the chore myself, but I fear that I will simply be reverted and forgotten. JDavidson^{Leave a message ::BEEP::} 23:17, 27 June 2008 (EDT)

Change Keith's photo

I suggest changing Keith's photo. Showing a random still from where Keith appears to be looking crazy is just childish. It's also unfair, considering this website shows an official studio photograph for Bill O'Reilly. This is inappropriate behavior for an unbiased encyclopedia.