Talk:Peter Pace
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Terryeo (talk | contribs) at 20:35, March 19, 2007. It may differ significantly from current revision.
oh gosh
The article is about General Pace's comment on a single issue. The man has lived since 1945, he has certainly worked and sweated and studied to arrive at his position. He has competed and proven his high moral fiber, his trustworthiness and ability to make decisions, to arrive at his position. Must we take a man in a high position, ignore his whole life and all of what he worked for, for 60 years and IGNORE it, so that we can present one, single comment he once made that was controversial? This is cheap news, this is slapping at the man, this is a very poor presentation of a trusted man's life and work. Terryeo 16:35, 19 March 2007 (EDT)