Scientific skepticism
From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by CSGuy (Talk | contribs) at 17:10, August 3, 2008. It may differ significantly from current revision.
Template:Stub The National Academy of Science says,
- "The fallibility of methods is a valuable reminder of the importance of skepticism in science. Scientific knowledge and scientific methods, whether old or new, must be continually scrutinized for possible errors. Such skepticism can conflict with other important features of science, such as the need for creativity and for conviction in arguing a given position. But organized and searching skepticism as well as an openness to new ideas are essential to guard against the intrusion of dogma or collective bias into scientific results." [1]
Dana Joel Gattuso wrote:
- The field of science is all about inquiry. Intolerance for questioning or even engaging in debate suggests a fear that a theory or hypothesis is not up to the test. [2]
