Talk:Media denial
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JohnD (talk | contribs) at 16:26, September 4, 2008. It may differ significantly from current revision.
Parody?
Since the user who created this article has just been blocked as the sock of a parodist, can this article be safely deleted?
- Sysop J.Martinez doesn't seem to think there's a problem with it. And there's nothing in this article which is not echoed elsewhere on CP. If this is parody, so are all of the other CP terms...AliceBG 10:53, 4 September 2008 (EDT)
- I think it could be read as a parody (it certainly doesn't read as encyclopedic) and since it was created by a parodist who has since been blocked I don't think it's a stretch.
- If it's going to stay could it be improved by linking to some examples of media denial? And cite some reports why the examples given are clearly true?--JohnD 11:04, 4 September 2008 (EDT)
- Good idea, please try... --User:JoaquÃn MartÃnez, talk 11:07, 4 September 2008 (EDT)
- Ok, in my opinion, of the tree examples given
- 1) Is completley subjective. It's a matter of opinion who was more experience out of the candidates, it is not 'clearly a fact'.
- 2) I can only find academic articles supporting the opposite conclusion, such as this one.
- 3) I can not find any work to support this conclusion.
- It is therefore my view that this article should be removed.
Hi, I edited the article, but only because I found it confusing, as if those bullet lists were done by Liberals. So I only tried to clarify it. I don't know the original poster (and in fact, I'm very new here). --BillP 11:08, 4 September 2008 (EDT)