Conservapedia talk:How Conservapedia Differs from Wikipedia

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mtur (talk | contribs) at 21:38, March 21, 2007. It may differ significantly from current revision.
Jump to navigation Jump to search

I think you meant authoritative support, but I won't correct it, it's your doc. So are you still going to say your site is neutral?--AmesG 17:29, 21 March 2007 (EDT)

Good point. Thanks. I corrected it.--Aschlafly 17:37, 21 March 2007 (EDT)

I would really like to know more about this "authoritative" source. What counts as "journalist opinion" vs. "reporting of facts" this is particularly important in regards to issues being raised at on this talk page. Tmtoulouse 17:34, 21 March 2007 (EDT)

A big flaw in Wikipedia's system is that it treats journalist's opinions as authorities. They aren't. In a court of law, such attempts would be laughable.--Aschlafly 17:37, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
Does this mean that Creationwiki is not considered authoritative? --Mtur 17:38, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia_talk:How_Conservapedia_Differs_from_Wikipedia&oldid=55272"