Talk:Darwinius masillae
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AddisonDM (talk | contribs) at 02:36, May 21, 2009. It may differ significantly from current revision.
Wording
You were correct to state it is not the classic "missing link", I think new "missing link" should be removed because it suggests a part of the human to ape question has been found, when it hasn't. "Claimed possibly to an ancestor of primates, including humans." This needs liberal wording and should be reworded as such "evolutionists claim it is the ancestor of primates, which they believe is the ancestor of humans."--Jpatt 22:33, 20 May 2009 (EDT)
- Good on the missing link. I was going to tweak some wording a little too. Thanks. AddisonDM 22:36, 20 May 2009 (EDT)