Talk:Theory of relativity/draft
In case anyone is wondering why this page exists, I'm writing a new version of this article, in an attempt to make it more scientifically sound. Geekman314(contact me) 11:40, 10 March 2007 (EST)
Is anyone going to add anything of substance? It only has 4 sentences, and it is misleading already. RSchlafly 16:30, 27 March 2007 (EDT)
I'll take a crack at it now. I have a basic understanding of special relativity. Its a very tough cookie to crack though and without delving into huge scientific proofs its hard to explain properly! I shall give it my best though. MatteeNeutra 16:37, 27 March 2007 (EDT)
I believe Andrew would want us to state that the Theory of Relativity is a materalistic theory like the theory of evolution.--TimS 16:42, 27 March 2007 (EDT)
I look forward to seeing the end result. There should be no issue here, as physics is physics.PalMD
- On the contrary, PalMD.... as I see it, time is under the exclusive control of the Flying Spaghetti Monster, and the way I see it, He's manipulating it with his Noodly Appendage just to futz with our science. "Haha, that'll confuse the suckers," He says, for lo, his ways are inscrutable. Sorry, I couldn't resist. But seriously, this article is shaping up great. I started as a physics major in college, and relativity scared me away, but law seems fun, so no harm :-) -AmesGyo! 17:12, 27 March 2007 (EDT)