Economics Homework One Answers - Student Four
Anna M.
1. Give an example of a "good" not in the lecture, and an example of a "service" not in the lecture.
An example of a good would be buying a computer. You pay for it, and you receive it. It's tangible and in your hand. An example of a service would be paying to have said computer delivered or repaired. The act in itself does not have substance, but it produces a result, which is what you are paying for in the first place.
2. Imagine that your family has two options for dinner: eat at home, or go out to eat at McDonald's. Which option incurs more transaction costs? Identify two specific transaction costs. Which option is cheaper for your family, and why?
Each option has its costs, but it would probably be cheaper to eat at home. However, you have to consider the situation your family is in, and the food you have on hand at home. This question is really too vague to answer completely, so let's consider what I think is the average situation.
Eating at home has its perks. First of all, you don't need to drive anywhere, which cuts back on gas costs and your time. Two, there is no tax or profit cost, like you would have at a fast food restaurant. And, you get the family atmosphere, which usually benefits the family elsewhere. However, you do have to buy the food that you prepare. This isn't a major cost, since there is no tax on produce. You also have to consider the amount of time it takes to prepare a dinner for a family. Not to mention the clean up and the electricity and water costs.
Eating at McDonalds also has some good points. It's fast and affordable. If you are in a hurry to get somewhere, McDonalds is a good choice. You can have dinner in all of ten minutes, and have no dishes to wash. However, you would lose out on the family atmosphere, as well as having to spend more money on gas. There is a tax on fast food, as well as the extra money McDonalds charges as profit and to pay their employees.
In conclusion, McDonalds has more transaction costs and is more expensive.
3. Define the concept of "scarcity" in your own words, and give an example of how an increase in scarcity for a good or service increases its price. Your example might be a World Series ticket (a good) or a special medical operation (a service), or anything else you can think of that is "scarce" in an economic sense. Extra credit: when do people exaggerate scarcity in their minds?
4. What is the âinvisible handâ? Discuss what it is, using an example (which could be from the story in the lecture about the making of a pencil).
5. There are many parables by Jesus in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke (and one in Mark) which use familiar concepts of money and economics in order to teach a deeper, more profound spiritual point. Examples are at Matthew 13:18-23 and 44-46; Matthew 18:21-35; Matthew 20:1-16 and 21:33-46; Mark 12:41-44; Luke 7:36-50; Luke 12:13-21; Luke 14:15-24; Luke 15:8-10; Luke 16:1-13 and 19-31; Luke 18:9-14; and Luke 19:11-27. Pick one of these parables and explain both the economic point and the deeper spiritual point. Extra credit: why might the Gospel of Matthew have more economic parables than the Gospel of Mark does?
6. "Caveat emptor" or "carpe diem": pick one of these concepts and explain what it means to you.
10. (Based on a true story.) Imagine that you are riding on an airplane and need to finish a written project by the time it lands in order to earn a fee of $500. The passenger next to you, however, keeps interrupting you by complaining about how she lost a $5 bill in the airport before the plane took off. You keep telling her to forget about it, but she won't. She keeps bothering you so much that you cannot get your work done, which is worth far more than $5. What would make sense in purely economic terms for you to offer to get her to stop bothering you about it? Explain.