Talk:Homo sapiens

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mtur (talk | contribs) at 02:54, March 30, 2007. It may differ significantly from current revision.
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Creationist View?

Can we add the creationist view on "Homo Sapiens?"

Yes, but keep it neutral.--Elamdri 19:48, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

Antarctica

There are permanent bases on Antarctica. Wouldn't that mean we inhabit all seven continents? --Dave3172 10:53, 14 March 2007 (EDT)

Not really according to most geographers I have talked to. Usually inhabiting means having people living there all thi time in the form of family units, towns, cities and the like. -Gasmonkey

Well according to this site [1] at least one baby was conceived and born there. Sulgran 04:22, 23 March 2007 (EDT)

Two Homo sapiens articles

There are two separate articles on this subject, Homo Sapiens and Homo sapiens. The lower case sapiens is the correct form, so we should merge the other one here.--Conservateur 01:45, 21 March 2007 (EDT)

Not a mammal?

"(I personally dispute this classification - revert me if you must)"

Are humans not vertebrates that produce milk for their young with hair, specialized teeth, three bones in the ear, warm blooded, and have a placenta when developing? This is what defines a mammal. If any of those are wrong, then we are not mammals. Being a mammal is a scientific definition and classification - not an idealogical one. --Mtur 22:54, 29 March 2007 (EDT)

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Homo_sapiens&oldid=74236"