User talk:Crzyclarks
From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Crzyclarks (Talk | contribs) at 02:53, June 5, 2012. It may differ significantly from current revision.
"Previous version was rife with inaccuracies/assumptions"...so you can change it to include your inaccuracies/assumptions? I've seen the only source your provided: a silly "we-the-undersigned" statement which proves nothing except what they want to believe. This website is not going to call their little fairy-tale a fact...not in the least. Karajou 22:39, 4 June 2012 (EDT)
What's wrong with the source? How about you come up with a source that will even come close to showing scientific consensus for your edit. Crzyclarks 22:45, 4 June 2012 (EDT)
