Compaq Computer Corp. v. Ergonome Inc.

From Conservapedia
This is the current revision of Compaq Computer Corp. v. Ergonome Inc. as edited by DavidB4-bot (Talk | contribs) at 18:28, July 14, 2016. This URL is a permanent link to this version of this page.

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

In Compaq Computer Corp. v. Ergonome Inc., 387 F.3d 403 (5th Cir. 2004), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed a jury verdict in favor of a defendant in a copyright case. The trial court had held that any copying by Compaq was de minimis and constituted fair use according to 17 U.S.C. § 107, and that doctrines of laches and equitable estoppel also barred Ergonome's claim.

The Fifth Circuit also affirmed an award to Compaq of attorneys' fees of $2.7 million partly as a sanction for unjustified litigation tactics, and held that an individual was liable as the alter ego of Ergonome as a sanction for repeated discovery violations throughout the litigation process.

Chief Judge Edith Jones wrote the opinion for the Fifth Circuit.

Retrieved from "https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Compaq_Computer_Corp._v._Ergonome_Inc.&oldid=1262426"