I think it could potentially be a lot of work. I would think reviewing '''up to''' 5 blocks per month and being choosy which ones we examine closely would be a good strategy. By saying, '''"up to"''' this gives us flexibility. We can always increase it if we need to. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:06, 17 August 2011 (EDT)
::Flexibility is in order. If, for some reason, more incorrect blocks have been made, it's necessary that we deal with each. However, I doubt being swamped will be a problem. Monthly or bimonthly seems reasonable. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 22:11, 17 August 2011 (EDT)
:::I have one editor patiently waiting in my email box for an appeal, and another one who wasn't clear, but who I ''think'' wants an appeal. --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 22:23, 17 August 2011 (EDT)
== A couple general considerations ==