Conservapedia:Contact Us

I would like to post the following to the Jesse Helms article after "Foreign Policy" but am locked out. I don't know why. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by BertSchlossberg (talk)

Editing is often turned off overnight (U.S. time), which may have been your problem, although that means that you shouldn't have been able to post here, so unless it was turned back on in the meantime, I can't explain it. Would you like to try it again? Philip J. Rayment 08:47, 19 December 2007 (EST)

Right. The Jesse Helms entry is not locked.--Aschlafly 09:06, 19 December 2007 (EST)

Senator Helms and the POW and KAL 007 Connection

On December 5, 1991, Senator Helms wrote to Boris Yeltsin concerning U.S. servicemen who were POWs or MIAs, "The status of thousands and thousands of American servicemen who are held by Soviet and other Communist forces, and who were never repatriated after every major war this century, is of grave concern to the American people." Yeltsin would ultimately respond with a statement made on June 15, 1992, while being interviewed aboard his presidential jet on his way to the United States, "Our archives have shown that it is true — some of them were transferred to the territory of the U.S.S.R. and were kept in labor camps... We can only surmise that some of them may still be alive." On December 10, just five days after Senator Helms had written Yeltsin concerning American servicemen, he again wrote to Yeltsin, this time concerning KAL 007, "One of the greatest tragedies of the Cold War was the shoot-down of the Korean Airlines flight KAL-007 by the Armed Forces of what was then the Soviet Union on September 1, 1983. . . The KAL-007 tragedy was one of the most tense incidences of the entire Cold War. However, now that relations between our two nations have improved substantially, I believe that it is time to resolve the mysteries surrounding this event. Clearing the air on this issue could help further to improve relations." Yeltsin would ultimately respond on January 8, 1992 by handing over to the International Civil Aviation Organization what the Russians had for so many years denied possessing: the tapes of the KAL 007's "Black Box" (its Digital Flight Data Recorder and Cockpit Voice Recorder) [1]

Concerning Stacy (3years) and Noelle (5 years) Grenfell [2], passengers on KAL 007, Senator Helms, who was on sister flight KAL 015, also making its way to Seoul Korea, would write:

"I’ll never forget that night when that plane was just beside ours at Anchorage airport with two little girls and their parents.

I taught them, among other things, to say I love you in deaf language, and the last thing they did when they turned the corner was stick up their little hands and tell me they loved me.

I’ll never forget that, and I know you won’t."

When only part of an article is accepted

I recently posted an entry, F-105 Thunderchief, and included a references section and a category, but in the final article, neither section shows up, although they are clearly present when the "Edit" button is clicked. Just now, this happened again with another entry I tried to make. What gives? Does the site only accept so much information in a new entry? --Frey 17:58, 27 February 2008 (EST)

You had a bad <ref> tag which I have fixed. BrianCo 18:02, 27 February 2008 (EST)

I did? Oopsie. And thanks.--Frey 18:09, 27 February 2008 (EST)

KAL 007 article on Main page

I would like to propose having the article Korean Airlines Flight 007 as a featured article on the Main page. Thanks.BertSchlossberg 15:32, 1 March 2008 (EST) (finally got it right!)

I'd like to review it in detail and hear what others think about it. On its surface, without yet studying it, it appears to be a major work. Congratulations!--Aschlafly 15:58, 1 March 2008 (EST)

There's a page for listing proposed featured articles. Philip J. Rayment 17:52, 1 March 2008 (EST)

To Kill The Child/Leaving Beirut

I just wrote an exteremly long and extensive artical about these two songs. Then, when I went to save the page, it said that it did not save it because there was a quote in their to explain about the song that contained a profanity. What gives? I thought that this website was supposed to educate people, yet people cannot be educated if they cannot know what the artical is talking about and what the proof is.