Changes

Conservapedia talk:Is the Bible Inerrant?

77 bytes added, 16:53, April 4, 2007
/* Not to be nit-picky but... */
::I think you've got the wrong idea about infallibility. Christians believe that the entire Bible is inspired by God and is therefore infallible, but that means that it infallibly records people doing the wrong thing, infallibly records the lies that people told, etc. It does ''not'' mean that every word is literally true and that literary devices such as metaphor and parable are not used.
::[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 06:49, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
:::Clarity in language is important. If something is claimed to be infallible, it best be awfully clear in its language. Go up to someone who has just learned how to speak English and tell them it's raining cats and dogs, see what kind of reaction you get. Further, in biblical times a rain of cats and dogs doesn't seem that implausible (see: Plague of Frogs).  :::Literal truth of the bible means just that. Literal, not metaphorical. [[User:Myk|Myk]] 12:52, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
== What's this article trying to achieve? ==
768
edits