Changes

[[File:Images.jpg|thumbnail|375px|right|The [[Creation "Research Society]] is a professional organization of trained scientists and interested laypersons committed to the scientific study of special creation as given in the book of [[Genesis]]. They publish a quarterly peer-reviewed [[Creation Research Society Quarterly Journal|creation science" journal]].<ref>[http://www.creationresearch.org/index.html The Creation Research Society]</ref> ]]'''Creation science''' is branch of [[science]] which sets out to show that [[supernatural]] [[creation]] of the material [[universe]] by [[God]] is consistent and compatible with the available scientific evidence. Being in the realm of [[origins science]], creation science is a historical science.<ref>[https://creation.com/its-not-science It's not science] by [[Creation Ministries International]]</ref><ref>[http://creationrevolution.com/2011/05/naturalism-doesn%E2%80%99t-work/ Naturalism Doesn’t Work]</ref><ref>[http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/ee/what-is-science What is science?]</ref> Most advocates of creation science believe the [[young earth creationism|earth is approximately about 6,000 yearsold]] old, and they publish scientific evidence supporting this view (See, for example, [[Counterexamples to an Old Earth]]). The ongoing discovery of hundreds of [[living fossils]] correlates well with creation science but finds no answer in Darwinian theory.<ref>Thomas, B. 2015. 'Living Fossils' Point to Recent Creation. Acts & Facts. [https://www.icr.org/article/8974/268]</ref> In addition, "scientists in the discipline of creation science" states state that the [[First Law of Thermodynamics|first law of thermodynamics]] and [[Second law of thermodynamics|second law of thermodynamics]] argue against an eternal universe. They also claim that these laws point to the universe being created by [[God]].<ref>[http://godevidences.net/space/lawsofscience.php Evidences for God From Space&mdash;Laws of Science]</ref><ref>Thompson, Bert, [http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/2329 So Long, Eternal Universe; Hello Beginning, Hello End!], 2001 (Apologetics Press)</ref><ref>http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/AstroPhysicalSciences14.html</ref> Creation scientists also assert that naturalistic processes alone cannot account for the [[origin of life]] and that the [[Evolution|theory of evolution]] cannot account for the various kinds of animals and plants. Both evolutionary scientists and [[Young earth creationism|young earth creation]] scientists believe that [[speciation]] occurs; however, young earth creation scientists state that speciation generally occurs at a much faster rate than evolutionists believe is the case.<ref>[[Creation Ministries International]], [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/3036/ Speciation: Questions and Answers]</ref> Many scientists in the field of creation science, such as the scientists at  [[Creation Ministries International]] and , a leading [[Answers in GenesisBible|biblical]][[creation]] science organization, assert declared: {{cquote|Creationist research is having a global effect that is worrying the [[Bible scientific foreknowledge atheism| Bible contains an understanding atheists]] and secularists of scientific knowledge beyond this world. They have had it all their own way for over a century but things are slowly changing. For almost twenty five years now, ''Journal of Creation'' has been publishing cutting-edge creationist research that believed to exist at has been fueling the time war against [[evolution]], creating little fires all around the Bible was composedworld, including [[Great Britain]]. In addition  Atheist evangelist, Prof [[ChristianityRichard Dawkins]] profoundly influenced , speaking at the [[Christianity and 20th anniversary of the Edinburgh International Science|development Festival in April 2008, said the rise of modern creationism in British schools raised a serious problem for scienceteachers. It is a very worrying trend,’ he said, ‘and I think a lot of it has come over from [[United States|America]] and [[Australia]].’<ref>https://creation.com/growth-of-creation-science-in-uk-worries-prof-dawkins</ref>}}

:''{{Main article: [[|Intelligent design]]''}}

Creation science is not accepted considered as pseudoscience by most scientists either in terms the majority of its claims or the scientific community. It is also commonly rejected by [[Atheism|atheists]] as a science, on they generally hold the [[worldview]] of [[Naturalism (philosophy)|naturalism]]. Liberals reject Creation Science with the spurious pretext that it cannot be disproved ([[falsifiable|falsifiability]]) and therefore cannot be considered "[[science]]".<ref>httphttps://web.archive.org/web/19991013122341/httphttps://abcnews.go.com/sections/science/DailyNews/evolutionviews990816.html</ref> <ref>http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/FAQ13.html#wp2727001</ref>  '''''However, Dr. [[Walt Brown]] argues that the field of creation science is scientific.'''''<ref>http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/FAQ13.html#wp2727001</ref> Also, creation scientists state and the evolutionists' objections to creation science are due to the their worldviews and preconceptions of the scientists, rather than on the basis of scientific evidence or the scientific validity of the idea.<ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/news/scientific_american.asp</ref>

* http://www.discovery.org/a/3524</ref> stated that Darwinism is "not a testable scientific theory, but a [[Metaphysics|metaphysical]] research programme."<ref>http://members.iinet.net.au/~sejones/PoE/pe05scnc.html</ref> Michael Ruse, a leading Darwinist and philosopher of science, conditionally acknowledged Popper's statement: "Since making this claim, Popper himself has modified his position somewhat; but, disclaimers aside, I suspect that even now he does not really believe that Darwinism in its modern form is genuinely falsifiable."<ref>http://members.iinet.net.au/~sejones/PoE/pe05scnc.html</ref>http://wwwHowever prominent evolutionist [[J.natureB.com/nature/journal/v394/n6691/full/394313a0S.html</ref> revealing Haldane]], when asked what would falsify the widespread alledged bias in impartial organizations theory of scientistsevolution, said "Fossil rabbits in the Precambrian."

{{Creation vs. evolution}} ==See Alsoalso ==*[[Bill Keith]], author of the Louisiana Balanced Treatment Act, struck down by U.S. Supreme Court*[[Creation vs. Evolution Videos]]*[[Creation vs. evolution debates]]*[[Creation]]*[[Creationism]]*[[Revolution Against Evolution website]]

*[[Theory of Evolution, Liberalism, Atheism, and Irrationality]]*[[Creationist contributions to science]]*[[Scriptural geologists‎]]*[[Counterexamples to an Old Earth‎]] ==External Linkslinks==*[http://associationforcreation.org/ The International Association For Creation]*[http://creationnetwork.org/ The Creation Network]*[http://visitcreation.org/ The Big Map of Creation]*[https://creation.com/ Creation Ministries International]

*[httphttps://www.icr.org/ Institute for Creation Research]

==Notes and References==