#::::'''REPLY''': The supposed precession of Mercury is based on non-repeatable observations as well as observations made by individuals with vested interests that the theories of relativity remain true. The error bars of various predictions could have been shifted by backfiguring to what would move them the closest in the future to the error range supposed to accompany the theoretical values. The foolishness around Global Warming theories show us that such a step is not only possible, but probable due to the observed vanity of scientists as well as to the falsification of the 1919 measurements made in hopes of rectifying the absence of a concrete example of the theories nearly two decades after their first proposal by [[Henri Poincaré]].
#:::::What on Earth are you talking about? Non-repeatable? It orbits the Sun every 88 days!! Think!! [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:07, September 13, 2021 (EDT)
#::::::The precession of [[Mercury]]'s perihelion disproves Relativity now, so data are withheld about it. Relativists no longer even cite this as an example demonstrating Relativity.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 00:13, September 13, 2021 (EDT)
#:
#::::Regarding which, even the authorship of the theories of relativity is an example of the misrepresentations used to promote it to fuel the self-aggrandizement of physicists and their profit motive, to be attained by increasing the esteem of the physics profession on the questionable basis of making academic noise to attract research dollars by using the theories as their tympana.