Difference between revisions of "Exact sciences"
From Conservapedia
(→Fuzzy subjects) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*[[creation science]] | *[[creation science]] | ||
*[[baraminology]] | *[[baraminology]] | ||
| + | *[[meteorology]] | ||
==Fuzzy subjects== | ==Fuzzy subjects== | ||
| Line 15: | Line 16: | ||
*[[linguistics]] | *[[linguistics]] | ||
*[[psychology]] | *[[psychology]] | ||
| − | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 03:59, April 29, 2009
The exact sciences actually measure what they study, as opposed to the "fuzzy subjects" which mostly engage in uninformed speculation. Evolution is a "fuzzy subject" subject because it cannot be witnessed, but rather is based on guesses using presupposed naturalism. Needless to say, exact sciences are far more accurate than fuzzy subjects.
Topics
- mathematics (excepting non-constructive mathematics, like proof by contradiction)[1]
- physics, astronomy
- chemistry
- volcanology
- seismology
- creation science
- baraminology
- meteorology
Fuzzy subjects
References
- ↑ For more discussion, see: Conservapedia:Critical Thinking in Math
