File talk:Lisbon.jpg
From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by (Talk | contribs) at 19:04, April 20, 2008. It may differ significantly from current revision.
This image is copyright www.sights-and-culture.com where there is an explicit assertion of copyright. The image does not add any meaning to the Lisbon article and the contents of the image are not discussed in the text, consequently any claim for fair use is entirely spurious. It should be removed from the article in question. KTDiputsho 14:09, 20 April 2008 (EDT)
- I do not agree. No valid reason. You have to bring here your legal sources for your claims. It seems to be only your opinion of what is good and what is wrong. --User:JoaquÃn MartÃnez, talk 14:30, 20 April 2008 (EDT)
- Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. § 107:
- Notwithstanding the provisions of sections § 106 and § 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include
- Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. § 107:
- A picture which does not identify the elements in it and is not referenced by the article in question clearly cannot be considered part of "criticism", "comment" or for "teaching" as it supplies no information; it is being used solely for the purposes of adornment and therfore cannot be considered fair use. KTDiputsho 14:52, 20 April 2008 (EDT)
- So sorry, but I do not agree. An image gives more than adornment, it teaches by it self. One image teaches more than a thousand words. --User:JoaquÃn MartÃnez, talk 15:04, 20 April 2008 (EDT)
