|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | [[Image:Liberal Brain.jpg|thumb|470px|top|<center>A [[satire|satirical]] conception of the liberal brain.</center>]]
| |
| | | | |
| − | A '''liberal''' (also '''leftist''') is someone who rejects logical and biblical standards, often for self-centered reasons. There are no coherent liberal standards; often a liberal is merely someone who craves attention, and who uses many words to say nothing.<ref>As one liberal website candidly observes, "Obama is a shallow narcissist, not a believer in any cause higher than himself. Every American president has had a healthy ego, but none has ever been as purely motivated by vanity as the childishly self-loving [[Barack Obama]]."[http://www.opednews.com/articles/Barack-Obama-s-ego-driven-by-Christopher-Calder-091210-804.html]</ref> Liberalism began as a movement for individual liberties, but today is increasingly [[statist]] and, as in Europe, [[socialist]]ic. Liberalism has changed over the years and degenerated into corruption. For example, FDR, one of the few great democratic Presidents, firmly believed in private sector unions, but vehemently opposed and condemned public sector unions, stating that the idea of collective bargaining can't be transferred to the public sector, as that would result in the government being unable to carry out its duties. Yet today, decades later, democrats and liberals are almost in bed with public sector unions, as they "donate" money to the re-election campaign in exchange for more taxpayer money in their wallets and fluffed up pensions.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | According to current dictionaries and their own beliefs, a liberal is "a person who favors a political philosophy of progress and reform and the protection of civil liberties" or "a person who favors an economic theory of laissez-faire and self-regulating markets".<ref>http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=liberal&sub=Search+WordNet&o2=&o0=1&o7=&o5=&o1=1&o6=&o4=&o3=&h=00</ref>, or "open-minded or tolerant, especially free of or not bound by traditional or conventional ideas, values, etc." or "favorable to or in accord with concepts of maximum individual freedom possible, especially as guaranteed by law and secured by governmental protection of civil liberties" <ref>http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/liberal</ref>. In practice, however, liberals are often the most intolerant of people, and frequently are on the side of disorder, chaos, anarchy, and lawbreaking. According to Webster's Unabridged Dictionary - and matched by current observation - liberals are '''"unchecked by a sense of the decorous, the fitting, or the polite...lacking significant moral restraints"''' or '''"...an emancipation from convention, tradition, or dogma that extends from a belief in altering institutions to fit altering conditions to a preference for lawlessness"'''<ref>''Webster's Third New International Dictionary of the English Language Unabridged'', Volume II; Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. Chicago, 1986. (pg. 1303, column 1)</ref> Polling data over several decades has consistently shown more Americans identifiy themselves as conservative than liberal, by a ratio of 2-1.<ref>http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1042/winds-of-political-change-havent--shifted-publics-ideology-balance</ref>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | A liberal generally supports many of the following political positions and practices:
| |
| − |
| |
| − | * Taxpayer-funded and/or legalized [[abortion]]
| |
| − | * [[Censorship]] of teacher-lead [[prayer]] in classrooms and school sponsored events
| |
| − | * Support for [[gun control]]
| |
| − | * Support of obscenity, pornography and violence in video games as a [[First Amendment]] right<ref>The [[Warren Court]], led by [[liberal]] Justices [[William O. Douglas]], [[Hugo Black]], [[Abe Fortas]], [[William Brennan]] and Chief Justice [[Earl Warren]] issued 36 decisions granting [[First Amendment]] rights to obscenity and pornography. These decisions remain fully supported by liberals today.</ref>
| |
| − | * [[Income redistribution]], usually through progressive taxation
| |
| − | * Government-rationed medical care, such as [[Universal Health Care]]
| |
| − | * Taxpayer-funded and government-controlled [[public education]]
| |
| − | * The denial of inherent [[gender differences]]
| |
| − | * Insisting that men and women be placed in the same jobs in the [[military]]
| |
| − | * Legalized [[same-sex marriage]]
| |
| − | * Tax and spend
| |
| − | * Trying to impede the freedoms of others
| |
| − | * Implementation of [[affirmative action]]
| |
| − | * [[Political correctness]]
| |
| − | * Support of [[labor union]]s
| |
| − | * Teaching acceptance of promiscuity through sexual "education" rather than teaching [[abstinence]] from sex.<ref> [http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,286671,00.html Democrats Aim To Kill Abstinence-Only Program Funding], [[Fox News]], Monday, June 25, 2007</ref>
| |
| − | * A "[[living Constitution]]" that is reinterpreted as liberals prefer, rather than how it was intended
| |
| − | * Government programs to [[rehabilitate criminals]]
| |
| − | * Abolition of the death penalty
| |
| − | [[File:Johnwaynegacyrosalynncarter.jpg|right|300px|thumbnail|[[Serial killer]] [[John Wayne Gacy]] was a [[Democratic Party]] activist who had his picture taken with First Lady [[Rosalynn Carter]] in 1978. In an interview where he denied killing any of his victims, John Gacy said he was [[bisexuality|bisexual]] and "very liberal".<ref>http://s151.photobucket.com/albums/s151/candypop_02/Serial%20Killers/John%20Wayne%20Gacy/?action=view¤t=SERIAL_KILLER_John_Wayne_Gacy_In-1.mp4</ref>]]
| |
| − | * [[Environmentalism]]<ref>[[Greenpeace]], for example.</ref>
| |
| − | * [[Disarmament treaties]]
| |
| − | * [[Globalism]]
| |
| − | * Opposition to the [[Bible]] and God.
| |
| − | * Opposition to full private property rights<ref>For example, the liberal wing of the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] issued the 5-4 [[Kelo v. City of New London]] decision authorizing the taking of private property by government in order to give the property to another private entity rather than convert it to a public use.</ref>
| |
| − | * Reinstating the [[Fairness Doctrine]]
| |
| − | * In 2005, it was reported by CBS News that [[Theory of evolution and liberalism|liberals were the most likely supporters of the theory of evolution]]. The theory of [[evolution]] is a key component of [[atheistic]] ideologies in the [[Western World]].
| |
| − | * Opposition to domestic wire-tapping as authorized in the [[Patriot Act]]
| |
| − | * Calling anyone they agree with a "professor" regardless of whether he earned that distinction based on a real peer review of his work (see, e.g., [[Richard Dawkins]] and [[Barack Obama]]).
| |
| − | * Opposition of [[Operation Iraqi Freedom]], a major part of the [[War on Terrorism]].
| |
| − | * Withholds support to our armed forces fighting overseas to protect their freedoms.
| |
| − | * Promote arrogance through what they consider superior lifestyles.
| |
| − | * Tolerance of wrongheaded ideas and lifestyles.
| |
| − | * "The long romance of Western leftists with some of the bloodiest regimes and political movements in history is a story not told often enough ...."<ref> [http://www.city-journal.org/2009/bc0605bt.html Dupes by Bruce S. Thornton], City Journal - 5 June 2009</ref>
| |
| − | *Support of leftist ideologies such as [[socialism]] and nazism
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==Liberals and Uncharitableness==
| |
| − | [[Image:228130875 35181424e3.jpg|thumb|right|175px|[[United States|American]] liberals give less to charity than American conservatives.<ref>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_liberal_giv.html</ref> In addition, [[per capita]] [[atheism|atheists]] and [[agnosticism|agnostics]] in the United States [[Atheism and Uncharitableness|give significantly less to charity than theists even when church giving is not counted for theists]].[http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/12-faithspirituality/102-atheists-and-agnostics-take-aim-at-christians][http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3647/is_200310/ai_n9340592/][http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Story?id=2682730&page=2] ]]
| |
| − | ''For more information please see'': [[Liberals and uncharitableness]]
| |
| − |
| |
| − | In March of 2008, [[George Will]] wrote at [[RealClearPolitics]] concerning the [[United States]]:
| |
| − | {{cquote|Sixteen months ago, Arthur C. Brooks, a professor at [[Syracuse University]], published "Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism." The surprise is that liberals are markedly less charitable than [[conservative]]s....
| |
| − |
| |
| − | If many conservatives are liberals who have been mugged by reality, Brooks, a registered independent, is, as a reviewer of his book said, a social scientist who has been mugged by data. They include these findings:
| |
| − |
| |
| − | -- Although liberal families' incomes average 6 percent higher than those of conservative families, conservative-headed households give, on average, 30 percent more to charity than the average liberal-headed household ($1,600 per year vs. $1,227).
| |
| − |
| |
| − | -- Conservatives also donate more time and give more blood.<ref>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_liberal_giv.html</ref>}}
| |
| − | [[Atheism|Atheists]] and [[agnosticism|agnostics]] often reject [[Bible|Biblical]] [[morality]] (and therefore [[conservative Christianity]] ) and hold to [[moral relativism]].<ref>http://www.barna.org/FlexPage.aspx?Page=BarnaUpdate&BarnaUpdateID=152</ref> Therefore, it is not surprising that [[per capita]] atheists and agnostics in [[United States|America]] [[Atheism and Uncharitableness|give significantly less to charity than theists even when church giving is not counted for theists]].[http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/12-faithspirituality/102-atheists-and-agnostics-take-aim-at-christians][http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3647/is_200310/ai_n9340592/][http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Story?id=2682730&page=2]
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == Liberal politicians and uncharitableness ==
| |
| − | The political magazine the [[American Spectator]] featured an article which focused on [[liberal politicians and uncharitableness]] and the article exposed the hypocrisy of the liberal politicians it featured.<ref>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=1c5_1238044128&c=1</ref>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | In addition, [[Barack Obama]] has been criticized concerning [[Barack Obama and uncharitableness|his charitable giving]].
| |
| − | == Nazism and socialism ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ''For more information please see:'' [[Nazism and socialism]]
| |
| − |
| |
| − | [[Image:Hitler.jpg|thumb|250px|right|One of the most well known political parties of the 20th century which was [[socialism|socialistic]] was the [[National Socialist German Workers Party]] (NAZI) which was headed by the [[evolution|evolutionary racist]] [[Adolf Hitler]].<ref>http://mises.org/daily/1937</ref><ref>http://creation.com/darwinism-and-the-nazi-race-holocaust</ref><ref>http://www.hourofthetime.com/socialist.htm</ref> ]]
| |
| − | The [[Ludwig von Mises Institute]] declares:
| |
| − | {{cquote|The identification of [[Nazi]] [[Germany]] as a [[socialism|socialist]] state was one of the many great contributions of [[Ludwig von Mises]]...
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The basis of the claim that Nazi Germany was capitalist was the fact that most industries in Nazi Germany appeared to be left in private hands.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | De facto government ownership of the means of production, as Mises termed it, was logically implied by such fundamental collectivist principles embraced by the Nazis as that the common good comes before the private good and the individual exists as a means to the ends of the State. If the individual is a means to the ends of the State, so too, of course, is his property. Just as he is owned by the State, his property is also owned by the State.<ref>http://mises.org/daily/1937</ref>}}
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == Liberal atheists, pederasty and NAMBLA ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ''see also:'' [[Atheism, pederasty and NAMBLA]] and [[Teenage homosexuality]] and [[Homosexuality and pederasty]]
| |
| − |
| |
| − | [[Image:Harry Hay.jpg|thumbnail|150px|Many consider [[Harry Hay]] to be the founder of the American [[homosexuality|homosexual]] movement.]]
| |
| − | Some of the well known [[atheism|atheist]] advocates of the [[North American Man-Boy Love Association]] (NAMBLA) are:
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 1. The atheist, political activist and [[homosexuality|homosexual]] [[David Thorstad]] was a founding member of the North American Man-Boy Love Association.<ref>http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/abbott/100822</ref>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 2. '''[[Harry Hay]]''' (1912 - 2002) was a liberal atheist advocate of [[statutory rape]] and the widely acknowledged founder and progenitor of the activist [[homosexual agenda]] in the [[United States]].<ref>http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2010/ss_politics0010_01_07.asp</ref><ref>The American Spectator Special Report, [http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=10450 When Nancy Met Harry], Jeffrey Lord, 10/5/2006.</ref><ref>http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2010/ss_politics0010_01_07.asp</ref> Hay joined the [[Communist Party of the United States]] (CPUSA) in 1934. <ref>''The Boston Phoenix'', [http://bostonphoenix.com/boston/news_features/other_stories/documents/02511115.htm The real Harry Hay], Michael Bronski, October 31 - November 7, 2002. </ref> He was a vociferous advocate of man/boy love. <ref>The American Spectator Special Report, [http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=10450 When Nancy Met Harry], Jeffrey Lord, 10/5/2006.</ref><ref>http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2010/ss_politics0010_01_07.asp</ref> In 1986, Hay marched in a [[homosexual|gay]] parade wearing a shirt emblazoned with the words "[[NAMBLA]] walks with me."<ref>http://www.mega.nu/ampp/baldwin_pedophilia_homosexuality.pdf</ref>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 3. The writer [[Samuel R. Delaney]] is an atheist and a [[homosexuality|homosexual]].<ref>Samuel R. Delaney, ''About writing: seven essays, four letters, and five interviews'', page 36</ref><ref>http://www.enotes.com/contemporary-literary-criticism/delany-samuel-r</ref> Dalaney has served as a professor at several universities. Delaney said he was a supporter of NAMBLA.<ref>Delany, Samuel R.; Freedman, Carl (2009). Conversations with Samuel R. Delany. Univ. Press of Mississippi, page 143</ref>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | === John Maynard Keynes and pederasty ===
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ''see also:'' [[John Maynard Keynes and pederasty]] and [[Teenage homosexuality]]
| |
| − |
| |
| − | [[John Maynard Keynes]] was the founder of [[Keynesian economics]]. Lytton Strachey, his male bed partner, wrote that Keynes was a “A liberal and a [[homosexuality|sodomite]], An atheist and a statistician.”<ref>http://www.keynesatharvard.org/book/KeynesatHarvard-ch09.html</ref> Keynes and his friends made numerous trips to the resorts surrounding the Mediterranean. At the resorts, little boys were sold by their families to bordellos which catered to homosexuals.<ref>http://www.keynesatharvard.org/book/KeynesatHarvard-ch09.html</ref> Keynes was a [[bisexual]] who married Lydia Lopokova. In his work ''The Cambridge Apostles, 1820-1914: Liberalism, Imagination, and Friendship in British Intellectual and Professional Life'', William C. Lubenow expresses the opinion that Keynes was an [[agnosticism|agnostic]].<ref>The Cambridge Apostles, 1820-1914: Liberalism, Imagination, and Friendship in British Intellectual and Professional Life, 1998, Cambridge University Press, page 402</ref>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | === Sam Harris claims atheist is right next to child molester as a designation ===
| |
| − |
| |
| − | see also: [[Views on Atheists]]
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Dr. [[Sam Harris]] is a founder of the [[New Atheism]] movement. [[Sam Harris]] is quite aware of the stigma surrounding atheism and has even advocated that atheists no longer call themselves atheists.<ref>http://newsinitiative.org/story/2007/06/19/interview_with_an_atheist</ref> In fact, Dr. Harris has said concerning the label of atheist, "It's right next to child molester as a designation."<ref>http://newsinitiative.org/story/2007/06/19/interview_with_an_atheist</ref>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==Liberals and Superstition==
| |
| − | [[Image:2384975035_230a0eac30.jpg|right|150px]]
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The [[Wall Street Journal]] reported: "A comprehensive new study released by Baylor University, shows that [[Conservative Christianity|traditional Christian religion]] greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of [[astrology]]. <ref>[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122178219865054585.html]</ref>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Also, in September of 2008, the [[Wall Street Journal]] reported:
| |
| − | {{cquote|The reality is that the [[New Atheism|New Atheist]] campaign, by discouraging [[religion]], won't create a new group of intelligent, skeptical, enlightened beings. Far from it: It might actually encourage new levels of mass superstition. And that's not a conclusion to take on faith — it's what the empirical data tell us.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | "What Americans Really Believe," a comprehensive new study released by Baylor University yesterday, shows that [[Conservative Christianity|traditional Christian religion]] greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of [[astrology]]. It also shows that the irreligious and the members of more liberal Protestant denominations, far from being resistant to superstition, tend to be much more likely to believe in the paranormal and in pseudoscience than evangelical Christians....
| |
| − |
| |
| − | This is not a new finding. In his 1983 book "The Whys of a Philosophical Scrivener," skeptic and science writer Martin Gardner cited the decline of traditional religious belief among the better educated as one of the causes for an increase in [[pseudoscience]], cults and superstition. He referenced a 1980 study published in the magazine Skeptical Inquirer that showed irreligious college students to be by far the most likely to embrace paranormal beliefs, while born-again Christian college students were the least likely.<ref>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122178219865054585.html</ref>}}
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == Liberalism in North America Today ==
| |
| − | [[File:Smear merchants.jpg|right|200px]]
| |
| − | [[Democrats]] and most media outlets in the [[U.S.]] are blatantly [[liberal]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.mrc.org/biasbasics/biasbasics1.asp|title=Media Bias basics|publisher=Media Research Center}}</ref> Liberalism in North America today practices three primary tactics to attack the Republican Party, and sometimes to attack American values in general. These three liberal tactics can be pronounced using the following [[acronym]]: ''SIN''. Liberals (1) '''S'''hift the subject, they (2) '''I'''gnore the facts, and they (3) '''N'''ame call.<ref>Scott Baker. [http://www.theblaze.com/stories/did-herman-cain-give-the-dont-miss-speech-at-cpac/ Did Herman Cain Give the ‘Don’t Miss’ Speech at CPAC?], ''[[The Blaze]], February 12, 2011.</ref><ref>[[YouTube]]. [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-N3-j3HM7-A& Herman Cain: "Stupid People Are Ruining America"], February 11, 2011.</ref>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | * Liberals typically support a "''mixed''" economy, a policy similar to that of [[fascism]]. <ref>{{cite web|url=http://fora.tv/2008/01/30/Liberal_Traits_of_Fascism|title=Video discussion about how modern liberalism is actually fascist by author Jonah Goldberg.}}</ref>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | * Liberals claimed a monopoly on [[compassion]], [[decency]], and [[social justice]] (as defined by themselves), posing as the sole defenders of [[civic virtue]] against a horde of backwoodsmen, racists, and religious fanatics. [http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/03/the_disgrace_of_liberalism.html]
| |
| − |
| |
| − | {{cquote|'''There's another goal, from my point of view, which is to try to lay the groundwork for a radical political force which would conceive of itself as distinctly to the left of moderate, reformist American liberals. And that has two aspects. One is to try to change that liberalism, to transform it by analysis, critique, and activism; the second is to build a radical movement which would be an autonomous force in its own right, which would be distinct from the traditional American liberal consensus. This radical part of the program involves not simply supporting the liberal students against conservative students and conservative professors, but trying to act on them, to push them to the left. It also involves trying to find and support, even trying to help create, networks of radical students in law school and of radical professors around the country — students and teachers who see themselves as wanting to go a lot further than most people want to go. <ref> [http://66.218.69.11/search/cache?ei=UTF-8&p=liberal+teachers&fr=yfp-t-501&fp_ip=MX&u=duncankennedy.net/documents/Liberal%2520Values%2520in%2520Legal%2520Education.pdf&w=liberal+liberals+teachers+teacher&d=BNZFhPReRjC1&icp=1&.intl=us Liberal Values in Legal Education] Duncan Kennedy (professor at Harvard Law School)</ref>}}
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ===Liberal Rankings of Congress Members===
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The National Journal compiles the votes of each congress member each year and uses the information to create rankings<ref>http://nationaljournal.com/voteratings/index.htm</ref> of how liberal each member of the United States [[Congress]] is. In addition to showing the voting records of each member and given an overall all ranking of liberalness, the National Journal also ranks congress members by liberalness in the areas of social, economic, and foreign policy.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==Liberalism in Europe today==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | In Europe, on the other hand, parties that call themselves ''liberal'' are moderate in outlook, ranging from centre-left to centre-right, promote typically economic and business freedom. The Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe<ref>http://www.alde.eu</ref> is a party of the European Parliament that represents most ''liberal'' parties from European countries. Similar policies are promoted by many ''liberal'' parties throughout the world,<ref>http://www.liberal-international.org/</ref> such as the Liberal Party of Australia.<ref>[http://www.liberal.org.au/]</ref>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Trade unions and socialist parties often criticize politicians for promoting lower taxes on business, or more flexible hiring and firing laws, by calling them "liberals" or [[neoliberal|neoliberals]]. Thus, just as in the US, "liberal" may occasionally be used as a term of abuse. But when someone is called "liberal" in Europe, it has an entirely different meaning than in the US. In fact, the US meaning of liberal is more similar to the politics of European [[socialist]] or [[social democracy|social democratic]] parties.<ref>[http://www.pes.org]</ref>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==Historical Liberalism ==
| |
| − | In history, the word "liberal" has meant different things at different times, and was associated with individual liberty in prior centuries. In the postwar period, liberals supported government intervention in the economy and welfare state policies, as well as peaceful coexistence with the communist block, which are not liberal policies in the sense of classical liberalism. After the end of the cold war, with the demise of socialism and communism, many liberals embraced some ideas from economic neo-liberalism, and coined it the "Third Way". In the area of national security and foreign policy liberals in the [[U.S.]] failed to define a consistent stance, even after the events of 9/11 and the beginning of the war in Iraq. Liberals generally support affirmative action, gay marriage, and abortion.<ref>"Political liberals tend, for whatever reason, to be ardent supporters of both gay rights and pro-choice programs." Greenberg and Bailey [http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/conway/TS/Bailey/Greenberg-Bailey/Homosexual%20Eugenics.pdf] </ref>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==Original meaning: Classical Liberalism==
| |
| − | Liberalism is a political philosophy with freedom as its core value. The term was originally applied to supporters of individual liberties and equal rights, but, in America, the term has come to represent a movement of social change that often conflicts with [[conservative]] values such as moral values and tradition.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | See [[Classical Liberal|Classical Liberalism]]. Compare [[Libertarianism]].
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == Infamous liberals ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ''See also:'' [[Infamous liberals]]
| |
| − |
| |
| − | *[[Joseph Stalin]] was an [[atheism|atheist]], [[communism|communist]], and [[evolution|evolutionist]] dictator who was responsible for the deaths of tens of millions.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | * [[Mao Tse Tung]] - atheist and communist dictator responsible for the deaths of tens of millions.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | * [[Margaret Sanger]]
| |
| − |
| |
| − | *[[John Wayne Gacy]] - In an interview where he denied killing any of his victims, [[serial killer]] John Wayne Gacy said he was [[bisexuality|bisexual]] and "very liberal".<ref>http://s151.photobucket.com/albums/s151/candypop_02/Serial%20Killers/John%20Wayne%20Gacy/?action=view¤t=SERIAL_KILLER_John_Wayne_Gacy_In-1.mp4</ref> Gacy was also a [[Democratic Party]] activist who had his picture taken with [[Rosalynn Carter]].<ref>http://www.digitaljournal.com/image/45527</ref>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==Liberal Organizations ==
| |
| − | *[[AARP|AARP - American Association of Retired People]]
| |
| − | *[[ACLU|ACLU - American Civil Liberties Union]]
| |
| − | *[[ACORN|ACORN - Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now]]
| |
| − | *[[AFL-CIO|AFL-CIO - American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations]]
| |
| − | *[[Amnesty International|AI - Amnesty International]]
| |
| − | *[[Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism]]
| |
| − | *[[Democratic National Committee]]
| |
| − | *[[Greenpeace]]
| |
| − | *[[NARAL|NARAL - National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League]]
| |
| − | *[[NAACP|NAACP - National Association for the Advancement of Colored People]]
| |
| − | *[[National Committee for an Effective Congress]]
| |
| − | *[[National Education Association]]
| |
| − | *[[National Organization of Women]]
| |
| − | *[[Planned Parenthood|Planned Parenthood Federation of America]]
| |
| − | *[[Progressives for Obama]]
| |
| − | *[[Rainbow/PUSH Coalition]]
| |
| − | *[[MoveOn.org]]
| |
| − | *[[A.N.S.W.E.R.]]
| |
| − | *[[U.S. Peace Council]]
| |
| − | Source: [http://www.politixgroup.com/lo.htm The Politix Group]
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==References==
| |
| − | {{reflist|2}}
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==See Also==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | * [[Conservative resources]]
| |
| − | * [[Conservapedia:Articles about liberals|Articles about liberals]]
| |
| − | * [[Classical liberal]]
| |
| − | * [[Drinking Liberally]]
| |
| − | * [[Godless liberal]]
| |
| − | * [[Last wordism]]
| |
| − | * [[Essay:Liberal celebrity obsession|Liberal celebrity obsession]]
| |
| − | * [[Essay:Liberal Behavior on Conservapedia|Liberal Behavior on Conservapedia]]
| |
| − | * [[Liberal Christianity]]
| |
| − | * [[Liberal Democrats]]
| |
| − | * [[Liberal Elite]]
| |
| − | * [[Essay: Liberal Falsehoods|Liberal Falsehoods]]
| |
| − | * [[Liberal Fascism]]
| |
| − | * [[Liberal friendship]]
| |
| − | * [[Liberal Gloss]]
| |
| − | * [[Liberal grading]]
| |
| − | * [[Liberal hypocrisy]]
| |
| − | * [[Essay:Liberal hysteria|Liberal hysteria]]
| |
| − | * [[Essay:Liberal Intellectualism|Liberal Intellectualism]]
| |
| − | * [[Liberalism and art]]
| |
| − | * [[Liberal labels]]
| |
| − | * [[Slander: Liberal Lies About the American Right|Liberal Lies About the American Right]]
| |
| − | * [[Liberal logic]]
| |
| − | * [[The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness|Liberal Mind]]
| |
| − | * [[Liberal Party]]
| |
| − | * [[Liberal supremacist]]
| |
| − | * [[Massachusetts liberal]]
| |
| − | * [[Progressives]]
| |
| − | * [[Scientific Illiteracy and Liberals]]
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==Further Information==
| |
| − | * [[Best_New_Conservative_Words#New_Liberal_Terms|New Liberal Terms]]
| |
| − | * [[Conservative Links]]
| |
| − |
| |
| − | {{liberalism}}
| |
| − |
| |
| − | [[Category:Political Ideologies]]
| |
| − | [[Category:Politics]]
| |
| − | [[Category: Liberals]]
| |
