Difference between revisions of "Nicolaus Copernicus"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Copernican Revolution: paradigm shift)
m (Life: HTTP --> HTTPS [#1], replaced: http://www.britannica.com → https://www.britannica.com)
 
(55 intermediate revisions by 30 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Image:Nicholas_copernicus.gif|thumb|left|150px|Nicholas Copernicus]]A remarkable Polish scientist named Nicolaus Copernicus (1473-1543) made a stunning claim that rocked the religious and scientific world:  he asserted that the earth revolved around the sun, not the sun around the earth. "Finally we shall place the Sun himself at the center of the Universe.  All this is suggested by the systematic procession of events and the harmony of the whole Universe, if only we face the facts, as they say, 'with both eyes open.'"
+
[[Image:Nicholas_copernicus.gif|thumb|right|150px|Nicholas Copernicus]]
 +
'''Nicolaus Copernicus''' (Polish:Mikołaj Kopernik, 1473-1543) was a [[Polish]] scientist, who published a model of the [[solar system]] that combined the [[heliocentrism]] of [[Aristarchus]] with the epicycles of [[Ptolemy]]. "Finally we shall place the Sun himself at the center of the Universe.  All this is suggested by the systematic procession of events and the harmony of the whole Universe, if only we face the facts, as they say, 'with both eyes open.'"  
  
Copernicus worked for years on his book describing his theory, and published it near the very end of his life.  He entitled it, "De revolutionibus orbium coelestium" ("On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres"), and published it in 1543.  The major parts of Copernican theory are:
+
== Life ==
 +
Copernicus was born in 1473 in Thorn as the youngest of four children. Between 1491 and about 1494 he studied liberal arts, as well as [[astronomy]] and [[astrology]] at the University of [[Cracow]]. He left before completing his degree, resuming his studies in [[Italy]] at the University of [[Bologna]], where he intensively dealt with astronomy.<ref>https://www.britannica.com/biography/Nicolaus-Copernicus</ref>
 +
 
 +
Copernicus worked for years on his book describing his theory of the [[solar system]], and published it near the very end of his life.  He entitled it, "De revolutionibus orbium coelestium" ("On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres"), and published it in 1543.  The major parts of Copernican theory are:
 
# Heavenly motions are uniform, eternal, and circular or compounded of several circles (epicycles).
 
# Heavenly motions are uniform, eternal, and circular or compounded of several circles (epicycles).
# The center of the universe is near the Sun.
+
# The center of the universe is near the [[Sun]].
# Around the Sun, in order, are Mercury, Venus, Earth and Moon, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, and the fixed stars.
+
# Around the Sun, in order, are [[Mercury]], [[Venus]], [[Earth]] and [[Moon]], [[Mars]], [[Jupiter]], [[Saturn]], and the fixed stars.
 
# The Earth has three motions: daily rotation, annual revolution, and annual tilting of its axis.
 
# The Earth has three motions: daily rotation, annual revolution, and annual tilting of its axis.
 
# Retrograde motion of the planets is explained by the Earth's motion.  
 
# Retrograde motion of the planets is explained by the Earth's motion.  
 
# The distance from the Earth to the sun is small compared to the distance to the stars.
 
# The distance from the Earth to the sun is small compared to the distance to the stars.
  
The reception to his work was initially positive within the Catholic Church (contrary to popular belief, [[Galileo]] was not persecuted for supporting the Copernican theory, but because he was disrespectful to the [[Pope]]). However, the reaction was negative among Protestants who felt it conflicted with some literal interpretations of the Bible, such as the account of how Joshua benefited from the sun standing still as it passed over the earth.  "And the sun stood still, and the moon stayed, until the people had avenged themselves upon their enemies. Is not this written in the book of Jasher?  So the sun stood still in the midst of heaven, and hasted not to go down about a whole day."  Joshua 10:13.  But there were few Protestants in Poland then (or now), and Copernicus died without much controversy.  
+
Copernicus was able to estimate the distances of the planets to the Sun, relative to the Earth's distance to the Sun, and correctly gave the order of the planets in distance to the Sun. Aristarchus was only able to compute the distance from the Earth to the Moon, and the radius of the Moon, and to crudely estimate the Earth's distance to the Sun. Copernicus also estimated the sidereal length of the Martian year.
  
[[Image:Copernicus_system.gif|thumb|left|300px|The Copernican System]]
+
The reception to his work was initially positive within the [[Catholic Church]]. Years later, the Church reconsidered in connection with claims by [[Galileo]] that the Copernican model had been proven correct. Copernicus' book was suspended until corrected by the [[Index Librorum Prohibitorum|Index]] of the Catholic Church in 1616, because the Pythagorean doctrine of the motion of the Earth and the immobility of the Sun "is false and altogether opposed to the [[Holy Scripture]]".<ref>Decree of General Congregation of the Index, March 5, 1616 (Translated from Latin)</ref><ref>[http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/galileo/admonition.html Trial of Galileo]</ref> These corrections were indicated in 1620, and nine sentences had to be either omitted or changed.<ref>[http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/04352b.htm Catholic Encyclopedia]</ref> The book stayed on the Index until 1758. In the 20th century, scientists adopted a view closer to the Church scientists. The consensus is now that motion is relative, that Earth-centered and Sun-centered coordinate systems are equally valid for astronomical calculations, that Galileo's main argument for the Copernican system was fallacious,<ref>Galileo argued that the motion of the Earth caused the tides.</ref> and that the doctrine of the immobility of the Sun is false.<ref>The Sun orbits around a black hole at the center of the Milky Way galaxy.</ref>
 +
 
 +
[[Image:Copernicus_system.gif|thumb|right|300px|The Copernican System]]
  
 
== Copernican Revolution ==
 
== Copernican Revolution ==
 
Copernicus's book title used the word "revolution" in the sense of planets revolving around the Sun, not in the sense of an intellectual revolt. In the late 20th century, the term Copernican Revolution has come to mean the prototypical [[paradigm shift]], where scientists suddenly became enlightened by rejecting the prejudices of their predecessors.
 
Copernicus's book title used the word "revolution" in the sense of planets revolving around the Sun, not in the sense of an intellectual revolt. In the late 20th century, the term Copernican Revolution has come to mean the prototypical [[paradigm shift]], where scientists suddenly became enlightened by rejecting the prejudices of their predecessors.
  
In fact the Copernican theory was no more accurate than the Ptolemaic model. It had no compelling physical arguments for its superiority, and it proposed no experiments for testing its novel features. Some people claim that it was aesthetically superior because it eliminated epicycles, but it actually had about the same number of epicycles as the Ptolemaic model. Many of the ancient Greek arguments for and against [heliocentrism] remained unresolved.
+
In fact the Copernican theory was no more accurate than the Ptolemaic model.  
 +
In some respects, it was actually less accurate, as more epicycles had to be added (in place of Ptolemy's [[equant]]).  
  
== Copernican Principle ==
+
* ... the original Copernican model was approximately as accurate as the Ptolemaic but performed worse for some planets. Galileo and Copernicus used perfect circles to model planetary motion.<ref>[http://www.scientus.org/Galileo-Battle-for-Heavens.html Galileo's Battle for the Heavens]</ref>
The Copernican Principle says that Man has no special place in the universe. According to some, this principle has an almost Biblical significance. For example, Encyclopedia Britannica says:
+
  
:''The implications of Copernicus' work can not be exaggerated. His views challenged the literal interpretation of Scripture, the philosophical and metaphysical foundations of moral theory, and even common sense itself. The result was a massive opposition to his reported ideas. It was the slow, sure acceptance of the heliocentric theory by natural philosophers that ultimately quieted the general clamor, however the name of Copernicus is still a battle cry against the establishment in religion, philosophy and science. In later years with Freud, man lost his Godlike mind; with Darwin his exalted place among the creatures of the Earth; with Copernicus man had lost his privileged position in the Universe.''<ref>http://abyss.uoregon.edu/~js/glossary/copernican_principle.html</ref>
+
It had no compelling physical arguments for its superiority, and it proposed no experiments for testing its novel features.
 +
 +
Copernicus's main argument in favor of his theory was that it was aesthetically more pleasing as it allowed the planets to move in uniform circular motion, an idea later proven false by Kepler.  Many of the ancient Greek arguments for and against [[heliocentrism]] remained unresolved for some time.<ref>Ancient Greeks objected to Aristarchus's heliocentrim because (1) we don't feel the Earth's motion, (2) unattached objects don't fly off, and (3) no annual stellar parallax. [http://physics.gmu.edu/~jevans/astr103/CourseNotes/history_greekGeocentricHeliocentric.html] Stellar parallax was not measured until 1838, while (1) and (2) were resolved by the work of [[Isaac Newton]].</ref>
  
All of this would have been unrecognizable to Copernicus. His model was readily accepted to the extent that it agreed with observation, and abandoned when better models came along later. He didn't challenge any moral theory, and he got Catholic Church approval for his book. Not everyone views the history of science as the story of how Man became insignificant.
+
==Modern Ideas==
 +
The [[Copernican Principle]] is named after Copernicus. This viewpoint states that the [[Earth]] has no special place in the universe, but it was not espoused by Copernicus.  
  
 
== Notes ==
 
== Notes ==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
 +
 +
[[Category:Astronomers|Copernicus, Nicolaus]]
 +
[[Category:Polish Mathematicians and Scientists|Copernicus, Nicolaus]]
 +
[[Category:Scientific Pioneers]]
 +
[[Category:Catholics]]

Latest revision as of 18:47, September 26, 2018

Nicholas Copernicus

Nicolaus Copernicus (Polish:Mikołaj Kopernik, 1473-1543) was a Polish scientist, who published a model of the solar system that combined the heliocentrism of Aristarchus with the epicycles of Ptolemy. "Finally we shall place the Sun himself at the center of the Universe. All this is suggested by the systematic procession of events and the harmony of the whole Universe, if only we face the facts, as they say, 'with both eyes open.'"

Life

Copernicus was born in 1473 in Thorn as the youngest of four children. Between 1491 and about 1494 he studied liberal arts, as well as astronomy and astrology at the University of Cracow. He left before completing his degree, resuming his studies in Italy at the University of Bologna, where he intensively dealt with astronomy.[1]

Copernicus worked for years on his book describing his theory of the solar system, and published it near the very end of his life. He entitled it, "De revolutionibus orbium coelestium" ("On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres"), and published it in 1543. The major parts of Copernican theory are:

  1. Heavenly motions are uniform, eternal, and circular or compounded of several circles (epicycles).
  2. The center of the universe is near the Sun.
  3. Around the Sun, in order, are Mercury, Venus, Earth and Moon, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, and the fixed stars.
  4. The Earth has three motions: daily rotation, annual revolution, and annual tilting of its axis.
  5. Retrograde motion of the planets is explained by the Earth's motion.
  6. The distance from the Earth to the sun is small compared to the distance to the stars.

Copernicus was able to estimate the distances of the planets to the Sun, relative to the Earth's distance to the Sun, and correctly gave the order of the planets in distance to the Sun. Aristarchus was only able to compute the distance from the Earth to the Moon, and the radius of the Moon, and to crudely estimate the Earth's distance to the Sun. Copernicus also estimated the sidereal length of the Martian year.

The reception to his work was initially positive within the Catholic Church. Years later, the Church reconsidered in connection with claims by Galileo that the Copernican model had been proven correct. Copernicus' book was suspended until corrected by the Index of the Catholic Church in 1616, because the Pythagorean doctrine of the motion of the Earth and the immobility of the Sun "is false and altogether opposed to the Holy Scripture".[2][3] These corrections were indicated in 1620, and nine sentences had to be either omitted or changed.[4] The book stayed on the Index until 1758. In the 20th century, scientists adopted a view closer to the Church scientists. The consensus is now that motion is relative, that Earth-centered and Sun-centered coordinate systems are equally valid for astronomical calculations, that Galileo's main argument for the Copernican system was fallacious,[5] and that the doctrine of the immobility of the Sun is false.[6]

The Copernican System

Copernican Revolution

Copernicus's book title used the word "revolution" in the sense of planets revolving around the Sun, not in the sense of an intellectual revolt. In the late 20th century, the term Copernican Revolution has come to mean the prototypical paradigm shift, where scientists suddenly became enlightened by rejecting the prejudices of their predecessors.

In fact the Copernican theory was no more accurate than the Ptolemaic model. In some respects, it was actually less accurate, as more epicycles had to be added (in place of Ptolemy's equant).

  • ... the original Copernican model was approximately as accurate as the Ptolemaic but performed worse for some planets. Galileo and Copernicus used perfect circles to model planetary motion.[7]

It had no compelling physical arguments for its superiority, and it proposed no experiments for testing its novel features.

Copernicus's main argument in favor of his theory was that it was aesthetically more pleasing as it allowed the planets to move in uniform circular motion, an idea later proven false by Kepler. Many of the ancient Greek arguments for and against heliocentrism remained unresolved for some time.[8]

Modern Ideas

The Copernican Principle is named after Copernicus. This viewpoint states that the Earth has no special place in the universe, but it was not espoused by Copernicus.

Notes

  1. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Nicolaus-Copernicus
  2. Decree of General Congregation of the Index, March 5, 1616 (Translated from Latin)
  3. Trial of Galileo
  4. Catholic Encyclopedia
  5. Galileo argued that the motion of the Earth caused the tides.
  6. The Sun orbits around a black hole at the center of the Milky Way galaxy.
  7. Galileo's Battle for the Heavens
  8. Ancient Greeks objected to Aristarchus's heliocentrim because (1) we don't feel the Earth's motion, (2) unattached objects don't fly off, and (3) no annual stellar parallax. [1] Stellar parallax was not measured until 1838, while (1) and (2) were resolved by the work of Isaac Newton.