Difference between revisions of "No Child Left Behind"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Critisism: typo)
(Criticism: more info)
Line 16: Line 16:
  
 
*Standardized tests often reflect how well a student can take a standardized test, not their critical thinking or problem solving abilities.
 
*Standardized tests often reflect how well a student can take a standardized test, not their critical thinking or problem solving abilities.
 +
 +
*NCLB hurts dropout prevention.  High schools are less likely to encourage low functioning students to stay in school, if their test scores will penalize the district.
 +
 +
*As of 2007, all states have failed to meet the teacher qualification standards outlined in NCLB.<ref>Aggie Online http://media.www.californiaaggie.com/media/storage/paper981/news/2006/05/22/CityNews/All-Fifty.States.Fail.To.Meet.Guidelines.Of.No.Child.Left.Behind.Act-2012761.shtml</ref>
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
  
 
NEA http://www.nea.org/esea/index.html
 
NEA http://www.nea.org/esea/index.html

Revision as of 03:37, May 14, 2007

No Child Left Behind is a 2001 law signed by President George W. Bush that holds public schools accountable for their students' test scores.

Under the law, a school whose students consistently fail standardized tests will be subject to disciplinary action, including giving vouchers to the students to study at more efficient private schools, or even firing the administration and teachers of the school and having the state government assume control.

Also it requires schools to allow displaced students to finish out the school year, which has been lauded by outreach counselors. The law has been claimed to be effective in ensuring that underprivileged youth receive the same standard of education as every other student by some, but many teachers say that it has failed.

Criticism

  • The scores of students who move into the district just before the standardized test are counted with the others'. For instance, a school could be penalized if a child of illegal immigrants moved into the district and scored poorly.
  • There is little leeway allowed for mentally disabled students, non-native English speakers, students with emotional problems, etc. The test scores are looked at with no interpretive data.
  • Not only must the school have high test scores, each racial group must as well. A school could be penalized if their minority students perform poorly, even if they make up a small fraction of the overall school population.
  • Teachers must sacrifice class time to prepare students for the test, practice the test, and give the test. Many teachers feel they are 'teaching the test' instead of the curriculum.
  • Standardized tests often reflect how well a student can take a standardized test, not their critical thinking or problem solving abilities.
  • NCLB hurts dropout prevention. High schools are less likely to encourage low functioning students to stay in school, if their test scores will penalize the district.
  • As of 2007, all states have failed to meet the teacher qualification standards outlined in NCLB.[1]

References

NEA http://www.nea.org/esea/index.html
  1. Aggie Online http://media.www.californiaaggie.com/media/storage/paper981/news/2006/05/22/CityNews/All-Fifty.States.Fail.To.Meet.Guidelines.Of.No.Child.Left.Behind.Act-2012761.shtml