Changes

The idea of '''Non-overlapping Magisteria''' is an apologetic put forward by proposes to separate [[liberalscience]] evolutionist from [[Stephen Jay Gould|Stephen Jay Gouldreligion]], with each to govern independently in their respective domains. Gould described NOMA as "a blessedly simple Science gets the what and entirely conventional resolution to .why, while religion gets meaning and value.(See also [[fact-value distinction]]. ) The idea is opposed by those who see God as the supposed conflict between Author of science and religion(see [[Creationism]])."

Magisterium It is defined an apologetic put forward by [[liberal]] evolutionist [[Stephen Jay Gould]].<ref>[http://www.ling.rochester.edu/~feldman/philosophy152/gould.htm Nonoverlapping Magisteria], Stephen Jay Gould, March 1997</ref> Gould described NOMA as "a domain where one form of teaching holds the appropriate tools for meaningful discourse blessedly simple and entirely conventional resolution" and the NOMA principle is "to ... the magisterium of supposed conflict between science covers the empirical realm: what the Universe is made of (fact) and why does it work in this way (theory). The magisterium of religion extends over questions of ultimate meaning and moral value. These two magisteria do not overlap, nor do they encompass all inquiry (consider, for example, the magisterium of art and the meaning of beauty)."

[[Magisterium]] is defined as "a domain where one form of teaching holds the appropriate tools for meaningful discourse and resolution" and the NOMA principle is "the magisterium of science covers the empirical realm: what the Universe is made of (fact) and why does it work in this way (theory). The magisterium of religion extends over questions of ultimate meaning and moral value. These two magisteria do not overlap, nor do they encompass all inquiry (consider, for example, the magisterium of art and the meaning of beauty)." This theory is demonstrably faulty because it is obvious that the [[Intelligent Design|intelligent design]] of the universe would leave behind perceptible evidence allowing the existence of God to be inferred without reference to faith. Furthermore , the NOMA principle would directly contradict Biblical evidence of miracles which if observable by scientists would be demonstrably true.

== References == {{reflist}}  [[categoryCategory:Evolution]][[Category:Science and Religion]]