Changes

'''Origin science''' or '''Origins science''' studies past [[singularity|''singularities'']] rather than present ''normalities''. It focuses on things that are believed only to happened once and, by their nature, are unlikely to happen again. It is more like a [[forensic science]] rather than being an [[empirical science ]] and due to impossibility to repeat past events, it uses [[ Argument from Analogy|analogies]] between the kinds of [[Cause and effect|cause-effect relationships]] that we see today. Origin science claims to give only ''plausible'' answers rather than ''definitive'' ones.{{#tag:ref| cf.''“Science cannot solve the ultimate mystery of nature. And that is because, in the last analysis, we ourselves are part of nature and therefore part of the mystery that we are trying to solve.”'' ― Max Planck<ref>{{cite book

|url=http://books.google.com/books?ei=sUV2UsHaM-W64ASsnICACA&hl=sk&id=smYPAQAAMAAJ&dq=Planck+Where+is+Science+Going%3F&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=last+analysis}}</ref>|group=note}} It tries to study the remaining [[scientific evidence |evidence]] of past events and measure interpretations by their ''explanatory power''.<ref>{{Cite book

Origins science "deals with the origin of things in the past—unique, unrepeatable, unobservable events."<ref>[http://creation.com/its-not-science It's not science] by [[Creation Ministries International]]</ref><ref>[http://creationrevolution.com/2011/05/naturalism-doesn%E2%80%99t-work/ Naturalism Doesn’t Work]</ref><ref>[http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/ee/what-is-science What is science?]</ref> According to R.Hedtke, it is apparent that explanations for origins are inherently and unavoidably [[religious ]] and, therefore, destined to be susceptible to adaptations by personal beliefs. Given the [[metaphysical]] status of origins research{{#tag:ref|For example, Aubert Daigneault classifies so called ''ultimate theories of everything'' as apearing metaphisical appearing metaphysical in the sense of having no phenomenological basis and enlists the claims of the existence of [[Singularity#The_big_bang_singularity|parallel universes]] and [[spacetime|space-time]] having more than four dimensions as belonging to this category. He further quotes [[Astrophysics|astrophysicist]] P.J.E. Peebles who declares with respect to [[cosmic inflation]] theory, pertaining to origin research, that it is not tested, and it is not easy to see how it could be falsified.<ref name="Capria">{{cite book |author=Marco M. Capria, Aubert Daigneaut et al. |title=Physics Before and After Einstein |publisher=IOS Press |year=2005 |chapter=13. Standard Cosmology and Other Possible Universes |pages=286, 288 |isbn=1-58603-462-6 |url=http://books.google.nocom/books?id=SdLLsj-0rqIC&pg=PA21&dq=Capria+physics+before+Einstein&hl=en&sa=X&ei=Sjx2Us_HCurw4gTP24C4Aw&ved=0CCsQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=ultimate%20theories%20of%20everything&f=false}}</ref> |group=note}}, it is unlikely that science can unequivocally prove any explanation for origins that would cause it to be universally acceptable.<ref>{{cite book